MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1023/b:aibe.0000030252.01514.ba

Медицинская библиотека · AIDS and behavior · 2004

A study of condom acceptability among men in an urban population in South India.

Thomas Beena Elizabeth, Rehman Fathima, Malaisamy Muniyandi, Dilip Meenalochini, Suhadev Mohanarani, Priyadarsini Padma, Purushotham Narendar Kilathi, Swaminathan Soumya

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This study examines the acceptability of condoms to men from Chennai, South India. A sample of 150 male respondents who, in the main, had at least one risky sexual experience with a commercial sex worker or multiple partners was interviewed. The respondents included HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals at sexually transmitted disease clinics, college students, and homosexuals. Awareness of condom usage was high, and 83% had used condoms at least once. The reasons for using condoms were protection from disease (43%), protection from AIDS (20%), and partner insistence (25%). Seventy-three percent of the respondents expressed dissatisfaction. Of those who used condoms for the first time, 72% were HIV negative, compared to 34% among those who did not use condoms. This indicates the need for developing the "condom habit," as using condoms at the first sexual experience is a strong predictor of future condom use.

Для цитирования: Thomas Beena Elizabeth, Rehman Fathima, Malaisamy Muniyandi, Dilip Meenalochini, Suhadev Mohanarani, Priyadarsini Padma, Purushotham Narendar Kilathi, Swaminathan Soumya. A study of condom acceptability among men in an urban population in South India.. AIDS and behavior. 2004. DOI: 10.1023/b:aibe.0000030252.01514.ba.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.