MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1086/516092

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 1997

Imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors and antibiotic susceptibility patterns.

Troillet N, Samore M H, Carmeli Y

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Potential risk factors for the detection of imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in hospitalized patients were assessed by a case-control study. Forty patients whose first P. aeruginosa isolate was resistant or intermediate to imipenem were more likely than 387 controls to have received imipenem (odds ratio [OR] = 16.9; P < .0001) and to have undergone organ transplantation (OR = 3.9; P = .008). No significant difference was found for treatments with other antibiotics, other underlying diseases, demographic characteristics, different exposures to the hospital environment, or the culture site. Imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates were more likely to be resistant to other common antipseudomonal agents than were imipenem-susceptible isolates. It is concluded that treatment with imipenem, but not with other beta-lactam drugs, is a major risk factor for the detection of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa in hospitalized patients, that these organisms may relatively often be resistant to other antipseudomonal agents, and that the hospital environment per se might not play a major role in their epidemiology.

Для цитирования: Troillet N, Samore M H, Carmeli Y. Imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: risk factors and antibiotic susceptibility patterns.. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 1997. DOI: 10.1086/516092.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.