DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.019
Validation of the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test as a Clinical End Point in Bronchiectasis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
A validated clinical end point is needed to assess response to therapies in bronchiectasis.
OBJECTIVES
The goal of this study was to assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) as a clinical end point in bronchiectasis.
METHODS
In clinically stable patients (n = 30), the ISWT was performed twice, 6 months apart. Correlation between the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the ISWT (n = 94) was performed. The 1-year gentamicin study was reanalyzed to assess the area under the curve (percent change of ISWT with a ≥ 4 unit improvement in total SGRQ). ISWT was performed prior to and following 14 days of antibiotics for an exacerbation (94 oral courses and 30 IV courses, n = 124) and reanalysis of the 1-year gentamicin study (n = 57).
RESULTS
The ISWT did not significantly change over 6 months while clinically stable. The ISWT correlated inversely with the SGRQ (rs = -0.60; P < .0001), Bronchiectasis Severity Index score (rs = -0.44; P < .0001), and sedentary time (rs = -0.48; P = .0007) but correlated with physical activity (rs = 0.42; P = .004). The area under the curve for percent change in ISWT with ≥ 4 unit improvement in SGRQ was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66-0.91; P = .001). A threshold of 5% improvement in the ISWT had a 92% sensitivity but 50% specificity, and from the responsiveness studies would capture 73% of all patients.
CONCLUSIONS
This study confirmed the ISWT to be reliable, valid, and responsive to change in patients with bronchiectasis. The authors propose that a minimum clinically important difference of 5% improvement in the ISWT would be a useful objective end point to assess therapies in bronchiectasis.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.