DOI 10.1186/s12903-026-07959-7
N-acetylcysteine nano-spray versus conventional treatment in the management of radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in oral cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) is a common and debilitating complication of radiotherapy in oral cancer patients, significantly impairing quality of life and potentially interrupting treatment. This study evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) nano-spray in managing RIOM, with particular emphasis on mucositis severity, quality of life, and serum gastrin-17 levels.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
In this randomized clinical study, 40 oral cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either NAC nano-spray (n = 20) or conventional therapy (n = 20) for six weeks. Mucositis severity was assessed using the World Health Organization (WHO) Oral Mucositis Severity Scale, and quality of life was evaluated using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Serum gastrin-17 levels were measured before and after treatment.
RESULTS
Patients treated with NAC nano-spray demonstrated a significant reduction in WHO mucositis grades and significantly improved OHIP-14 scores compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, a significant increase in serum gastrin-17 levels was observed in the NAC group relative to conventional therapy (p < 0.05). These effects were evident during radiotherapy and at the end of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
N-acetylcysteine nano-spray appears to be an effective therapeutic option for the management of RIOM, reducing mucositis severity and improving quality of life in oral cancer patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at Clinical Trials .gov on 24/7/2025, registration number: (NCT07082621).
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.