MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.semradonc.2026.151006

Медицинская библиотека · Seminars in radiation oncology · 2026

An Evaluation of Radiation Oncology Patient Education Materials: Readability, Gaps, and Health Literacy Implications.

Hart Riley, Lawrie Karen, Wong Rebecca, Li Winnie, Giuliani Meredith Elana, Papadakos Janet

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This review presents a summary of radiation therapy patient education materials. The purpose is to evaluate the quality, readability, and relevance of print-format pamphlets used to support patients undergoing radiation therapy; one large, urban academic cancer center is discussed as a reference for key materials. A literature review identified patient information needs, an environmental scan compared the cancer centre's pamphlet collection with those of leading cancer centres, and assessments used the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) and the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level formula. The review revealed gaps in technical content, inconsistent formatting, and readability levels that exceed recommended standards. The review highlights opportunities to improve clarity, consistency, and accessibility by incorporating plain language, standardizing content, and integrating multimedia resources. These findings offer practical guidance for enhancing patient education and health literacy in oncology care and will directly inform ongoing quality improvement efforts, including a broader review of all patient education materials.

Для цитирования: Hart Riley, Lawrie Karen, Wong Rebecca, Li Winnie, Giuliani Meredith Elana, Papadakos Janet. An Evaluation of Radiation Oncology Patient Education Materials: Readability, Gaps, and Health Literacy Implications.. Seminars in radiation oncology. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2026.151006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.