DOI 10.1007/s11325-021-02540-8
Review of the prevalence, pathogenesis and management of OSA-COPD overlap.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: OSA-COPD overlap is an important and prevalent condition yet remains under-recognised among the vast majority of respiratory health professionals. Patients with OSA-COPD overlap experience more severe respiratory symptoms and worse quality of life, and the relative risk of exacerbations, hospitalisations, and mortality is higher than in either disease state alone.
METHODS
Electronic databases PUBMED and Google Scholar were searched for studies and academic papers that discussed OSA-COPD overlap. Relevant papers that discussed prevalence, pathophysiology, microbiome studies, treatment regimens and outcomes were included in this paper.
RESULTS
High-risk patients with either COPD or OSA should be screened for overlap syndrome as part of routine clinical practice. Screening questionnaires can identify high-risk patients with COPD who may benefit from formal polysomnography. Patients with OSA who are aged over 40 with a significant smoking history or environmental exposures have an increased pre-test probability of obstructive airway disease. The potential roles of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and lung-gut microbiome are evolving and merit further investigation. A tailored approach to reach a timely diagnosis and thus optimisation of both conditions are key to management. CPAP is the primary therapy for OSA; however, patients with more advanced COPD, with daytime hypercapnia or severe nocturnal desaturations, may benefit from bilevel positive airway pressure.
CONCLUSION
Increased awareness, access to timely investigations and initiation of therapy will improve overall outcomes in OSA-COPD overlap by reducing hospitalisations for exacerbations of COPD and improve mortality rates.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.