International endodontic journal · 2024
Outcomes and prognostic factors of endodontically treated teeth filled with calcium silicate- or epoxy resin-based root canal sealers: A retrospective cohort study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kangseng Titanan, Banomyong Danuchit, Osiri Sittichoke, Jantarat Jeeraphat
Аннотация
AIM: The objectives of this study were to compare the clinical outcomes of root canal treatment between calcium silicate-based sealer using the cold hydraulic condensation technique and epoxy resin-based sealer using warm vertical compaction and to identify the prognostic factors affecting the outcomes of both obturation techniques.
METHODOLOGY: Dental records and radiographs of the teeth that received root canal treatment with calcium silicate-based sealer using the cold hydraulic condensation technique or epoxy resin-based sealer using warm vertical compaction during 2015-2021 were selected using inclusion and exclusion criteria. The cases were matched between the two groups based on four factors: primary root canal treatment or retreatment, tooth type, periapical lesion and its size and extension of root canal filling. The success rates of root canal treatment between two sealers/obturation techniques were analysed. The incidence and resorption of extruded sealer were evaluated using the McNemar's test. Generalized estimated equations were used to evaluate any prognostic factors.
RESULTS: The median recall period of this study was 15 months. A total of 234 teeth, comprising 117 cases in each sealer/obturation group, were included. No significant difference was found in the success rates between the calcium silicate-based sealer using the cold hydraulic condensation technique group (91.5%) and the epoxy resin-based sealer using the warm vertical compaction group (94.9%). The incidence of sealer extrusion for the calcium silicate-based sealer (27.6%) did not significantly differ from that of the epoxy resin-based sealer (36.2%), with both sealers typically demonstrating no resorption at recalls. No prognostic factors related to the success rate of either technique were detected.
CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest no difference in the success rate between calcium silicate-based sealer and epoxy resin-based sealer. The study did not identify any prognostic factors that significantly influenced the outcomes of the endodontic treatments.
METHODOLOGY: Dental records and radiographs of the teeth that received root canal treatment with calcium silicate-based sealer using the cold hydraulic condensation technique or epoxy resin-based sealer using warm vertical compaction during 2015-2021 were selected using inclusion and exclusion criteria. The cases were matched between the two groups based on four factors: primary root canal treatment or retreatment, tooth type, periapical lesion and its size and extension of root canal filling. The success rates of root canal treatment between two sealers/obturation techniques were analysed. The incidence and resorption of extruded sealer were evaluated using the McNemar's test. Generalized estimated equations were used to evaluate any prognostic factors.
RESULTS: The median recall period of this study was 15 months. A total of 234 teeth, comprising 117 cases in each sealer/obturation group, were included. No significant difference was found in the success rates between the calcium silicate-based sealer using the cold hydraulic condensation technique group (91.5%) and the epoxy resin-based sealer using the warm vertical compaction group (94.9%). The incidence of sealer extrusion for the calcium silicate-based sealer (27.6%) did not significantly differ from that of the epoxy resin-based sealer (36.2%), with both sealers typically demonstrating no resorption at recalls. No prognostic factors related to the success rate of either technique were detected.
CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest no difference in the success rate between calcium silicate-based sealer and epoxy resin-based sealer. The study did not identify any prognostic factors that significantly influenced the outcomes of the endodontic treatments.