Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2025
Multiformula Prediction Range: a univariate predictor of IOL Power Calculation Accuracy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Romero Daniel, Cárceles Montoya Alicia, Alió Jorge L, Moya Martínez Alejandro, Tarazona Jaimes Claudia, Martínez-Toldos Jose Juan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of range between the predictions of 5 different calculation formulas in IOL power calculation accuracy.
SETTINGS: General University Hospital of Elche, Spain.
DESIGN: Retrospective Sequential Cohort.
METHODS: In this retrospective sequential cohort, the LenStar LS900 (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland) was used for the preoperative biometry. The predicted spherical equivalent refraction of the implanted IOL were calculated for 5 different formulas: Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) 2.0, Hill RBF-3.0, Kane, PEARL-DGS. Multiformula Prediction Range was defined as the range of the refractive error predicted by the 5 formulas. According to the median of the Multiformula Prediction Range the sample was divided into a low and high spread group (LS and HS respectively).
RESULTS: 278 eyes were included. The standard deviation of the prediction error was significantly lower in the LS group for all included formulas. For the Barrett Universal II, EVO 2.0, RBF-3.0, Kane and PEARL-DGS formulae, the median absolute error (MdAE) was significantly lower in the LS group compared to the HS group (p-values of 0.001, 0.027, 0.004, 0.028 and 0.035, respectively). The percentage of eyes within the ±0.50D PE range was significantly higher in the LS group for all five analyzed formulas.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiformula Prediction Range can be a novel univariate predictor of IOL power calculation accuracy and a potential determinant for identifying patient suitable for immediate sequential cataract surgery. Accuracy was consistently higher for all five included formulas in the Low Spread group.
SETTINGS: General University Hospital of Elche, Spain.
DESIGN: Retrospective Sequential Cohort.
METHODS: In this retrospective sequential cohort, the LenStar LS900 (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland) was used for the preoperative biometry. The predicted spherical equivalent refraction of the implanted IOL were calculated for 5 different formulas: Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) 2.0, Hill RBF-3.0, Kane, PEARL-DGS. Multiformula Prediction Range was defined as the range of the refractive error predicted by the 5 formulas. According to the median of the Multiformula Prediction Range the sample was divided into a low and high spread group (LS and HS respectively).
RESULTS: 278 eyes were included. The standard deviation of the prediction error was significantly lower in the LS group for all included formulas. For the Barrett Universal II, EVO 2.0, RBF-3.0, Kane and PEARL-DGS formulae, the median absolute error (MdAE) was significantly lower in the LS group compared to the HS group (p-values of 0.001, 0.027, 0.004, 0.028 and 0.035, respectively). The percentage of eyes within the ±0.50D PE range was significantly higher in the LS group for all five analyzed formulas.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiformula Prediction Range can be a novel univariate predictor of IOL power calculation accuracy and a potential determinant for identifying patient suitable for immediate sequential cataract surgery. Accuracy was consistently higher for all five included formulas in the Low Spread group.