DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106984
Acute carpal tunnel syndrome: Clinical, electromyographic, and ultrasound features in 25 patients.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
The acute presentation of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is rare. When symptoms start acutely with no obvious causes, ultrasound (US) imaging may provide clues to the etiology.
OBJECTIVE
This study describes the clinical, electromyographic, and US findings in 25 patients presenting with acute CTS (ACTS).
METHODS
In this analysis, of the patients referred for electrodiagnostic confirmation of CTS over the past decade, 25 had an acute onset of symptoms. All patients underwent EMG/NCV and US of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel and forearm.
RESULTS
Of the 25 cases with ACTS, 5 (20%) had bilateral involvement leading to the total hands studied to 30. In 14 (56%) patients, an inciting event was identified as a possible cause of ACTS. In 11 (44%) patients without an antecedent event, 7 (64%) had a persistent median artery (PMA) detected by US. Electrodiagnostic studies showed prolonged distal motor latency with normal motor conduction velocity proximal to the carpal tunnel in 24 (80%) of 30 hands, 6 (20%) hands showed absent compound muscle action potentials over the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), and 22 (73%) hands had absent sensory potentials. Denervation changes were seen in the APB in 13 (43%) hands, and motor unit potentials were absent in 6 (20%) hands. Sixteen (64%) patients underwent a carpal tunnel release for severe symptoms.
CONCLUSION
CTS may present acutely without a clinically identifiable cause. US complements electrodiagnostic studies and is particularly useful when electrodiagnostic tests are non-diagnostic (due to absent compound muscle and sensory action potentials). US may also provide clues to the underlying cause.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.