Clinical biochemistry · 2017
Cell-free DNA characteristics and chimerism analysis in patients after allogeneic cell transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duque-Afonso Jesus, Waterhouse Miguel, Pfeifer Dietmar, Follo Marie, Duyster Justus, Bertz Hartmut, Finke Jürgen
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolated from plasma or serum has received increasing interest for diagnostic applications in pregnancy, solid tumors and solid organ transplantation. The reported clinical usefulness of cfDNA obtained from plasma or serum in patients undergoing allogeneic cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is scarce.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the potential clinical utility of cfDNA chimerism analysis after alloHSCT.
DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 196 samples obtained from 110 patients were investigated for their chimeric status both in peripheral blood and plasma using standard PCR for microsatellite amplification. Plasma DNA size distribution was analyzed using capillary electrophoresis.
RESULTS: The mean cfDNA concentration in the transplanted patients was 469ng/ml (range: 50-10,700ng/ml). The size range of almost 80% of the analyzed fragments was between 80 and 200bp. In 41 out of the 110 patients included in the study a mixture of donor and recipient plasma cfDNA was detected. There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of plasma mixed chimerism between the patients without transplant related complications and the patients with either GvHD (p<0.05) or relapse (p<0.01). In those patients who showed improvement of GvHD also displayed a decrease in the observable percentage of recipient cfDNA during GvHD treatment. In patients without improvement or even with worsening of acute GvHD, stable or increasing levels of recipient cfDNA were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: cfDNA in combination with peripheral blood and bone marrow cell chimerism analysis might improve its utility in the clinic in particular in those patients with clinical complications after alloHSCT.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the potential clinical utility of cfDNA chimerism analysis after alloHSCT.
DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 196 samples obtained from 110 patients were investigated for their chimeric status both in peripheral blood and plasma using standard PCR for microsatellite amplification. Plasma DNA size distribution was analyzed using capillary electrophoresis.
RESULTS: The mean cfDNA concentration in the transplanted patients was 469ng/ml (range: 50-10,700ng/ml). The size range of almost 80% of the analyzed fragments was between 80 and 200bp. In 41 out of the 110 patients included in the study a mixture of donor and recipient plasma cfDNA was detected. There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of plasma mixed chimerism between the patients without transplant related complications and the patients with either GvHD (p<0.05) or relapse (p<0.01). In those patients who showed improvement of GvHD also displayed a decrease in the observable percentage of recipient cfDNA during GvHD treatment. In patients without improvement or even with worsening of acute GvHD, stable or increasing levels of recipient cfDNA were detected.
CONCLUSIONS: cfDNA in combination with peripheral blood and bone marrow cell chimerism analysis might improve its utility in the clinic in particular in those patients with clinical complications after alloHSCT.