MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24021

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021

Fiber-optic Bronchoscope-guided vs Mini-surgical Technique of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Units.

Kumar Abhijit, Kohli Amit, Kachru Nishtha, Bhadoria Poonam, Wadhawan Sonia, Kumar Deepak

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PCDT) using fiber-optic bronchoscope (FOB) is a widely practiced technique, but its availability and cost remain a concern in nations with limited resources. Mini-surgical technique of PCDT incorporating minimal blunt dissection has shown improved results even without the use of FOB. The study is primarily intended to compare these two techniques and establish a safer cost-effective alternative to FOB-guided PCDTs.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

This randomized comparative study [registered (CTRI/2018/04/013191)] was conducted on 120 mechanically ventilated patients. In 60 patients, mini-surgical PCDT (group-M) was performed with 2 cm longitudinal skin incision and blunt dissection till pretracheal fascia without FOB guidance using Portex-Ultraperc™ sets. In remaining 60 patients, PCDT was performed under FOB vision with similar skin incision (without blunt dissection) using Portex-Ultraperc™ sets (group-F). Two techniques were compared with regard to procedural time and percentage of complications occurred during or after the procedure.

RESULTS

Procedure time [group-M: 6.30 ± 1.28 minutes; group-F: 14.43 ± 1.84 minutes (p <0.001)] and mean blood loss [group-M: 5.33 ± 1.69 mL; group-F: 6.87 ± 3.11 mL (p = 0.001)] was significantly less in group-M. Higher incidence of desaturation [group-M: 16.7%; group-F: 35% (p = 0.022)] was noted in group-F, whereas arrhythmias [group-M: 21.7%; group-F: 6.7% (p = 0.018)] were higher in group-M. There was no statistical difference in incidence of pneumothorax and subcutaneous emphysema. There was no incidence of posterior tracheal wall perforation in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Mini-surgical technique is a faster alternative of FOB-guided PCDT with comparable incidence of complications. It can safely be used in intensive care units (ICUs) where FOB is not available.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2018/05/014307.

NAME OF REGISTRY: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI), URL-http://ctri.nic.in.

HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Kumar A, Kohli A, Kachru N, Bhadoria P, Wadhawan S, Kumar D. Fiber-optic Bronchoscope-guided vs Mini-surgical Technique of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Units. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(11):1269-1274.

Для цитирования: Kumar Abhijit, Kohli Amit, Kachru Nishtha, Bhadoria Poonam, Wadhawan Sonia, Kumar Deepak. Fiber-optic Bronchoscope-guided vs Mini-surgical Technique of Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy in Intensive Care Units.. Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. 2021. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24021.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.