MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/1759-7714.14212

Медицинская библиотека · Thoracic cancer · 2021

CT-guided microwave ablation in patients with lung metastases from breast cancer.

Meng Min, Han Xiaoying, Li Wenhong, Huang Guanghui, Ni Yang, Wang Jiao, Zhang Tiehong, Dai Jianjian, Zou Zhigeng, Yang Xia, Ye Xin

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) is a very common ablation method that shows a good local tumor control rate in primary and secondary lung tumors. At present, few reports have explored the safety and efficacy of MWA for lung metastases from breast cancer.

METHODS

From January 2012 to January 2018, 32 breast cancer patients with 46 pulmonary metastases received CT-guided percutaneous MWA. The study was approved by the local institutional review board. The clinical efficacy and complications of MWA were investigated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 32 months and the main effective rate was 97.8% (45/46). Five of 46 lesions had local progression (10.9%), with a median progression time of 10 months. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 96.9%, 53.3%, and 17.8%, respectively. The median OS time was 36 months. Among 46 MWA treatments, 11 (23.9%) had massive pneumothorax, two (4.3%) had massive pleural effusion, and two (4.3%) had a pulmonary infection.

CONCLUSION

CT-guided percutaneous MWA may be safe and effective for treating lung metastases from breast cancer.

Для цитирования: Meng Min, Han Xiaoying, Li Wenhong, Huang Guanghui, Ni Yang, Wang Jiao, Zhang Tiehong, Dai Jianjian, Zou Zhigeng, Yang Xia, Ye Xin. CT-guided microwave ablation in patients with lung metastases from breast cancer.. Thoracic cancer. 2021. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14212.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.