Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
Comparison of Hemodynamic Status with Three Different Doses of Lidocaine as an Adjunct to Propofol-Remifentanil During Endotracheal Intubation in Elderly Female Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xiao Fei, Xu Lu-Qi, Yan Hai-Ya, Zhou Si, Fan Jia-Ming, Liu Lin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lidocaine was reported to stabilize the hemodynamic status and reduce the incidence of postinduction hypotension in elderly patients. However, the optimal dose of lidocaine as an adjuvant to propofol-remifentanil during endotracheal intubation in elderly female patients remains uncertain. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal dose of lidocaine as an adjuvant for propofol-remifentanil in elderly female patients.
METHODS: Two hundred and forty patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups in a ratio of 1:1:1, each receiving a different dosage of lidocaine: 0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, or 1.5 mg/kg, with propofol-remifentanil for endotracheal intubation. Patients' hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored 10 minutes after the induction of anesthesia. Hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure <70% of the baseline value and/or <65 mm Hg, and treated with norepinephrine 4 μg, repeated as necessary. Norepinephrine consumption (primary outcome), mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and propofol consumption were recorded.
RESULTS: The incidence of hypotension was 51.4% (37/72), 13.0% (9/69), and 13.8% (9/65) in Groups 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5, respectively. The median (25th and 75th quartiles) consumption of norepinephrine was 4 (0-4) μg, 0 (0-0) μg, and 0 (0-0) μg across the groups, respectively; there was a significant difference among the groups (p = 0.0006). The incidence of hypertension was 15.7% (11/72), 5.8% (4/69), and 6.2% (4/65) across the groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In summary, under the conditions of this study, we propose that 1.0 mg/kg lidocaine may be considered as an optimal dose when used as an adjuvant to propofol-remifentanil for endotracheal intubation.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number: ChiCTR2400092990 https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=231367.
METHODS: Two hundred and forty patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups in a ratio of 1:1:1, each receiving a different dosage of lidocaine: 0.5 mg/kg, 1.0 mg/kg, or 1.5 mg/kg, with propofol-remifentanil for endotracheal intubation. Patients' hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored 10 minutes after the induction of anesthesia. Hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure <70% of the baseline value and/or <65 mm Hg, and treated with norepinephrine 4 μg, repeated as necessary. Norepinephrine consumption (primary outcome), mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and propofol consumption were recorded.
RESULTS: The incidence of hypotension was 51.4% (37/72), 13.0% (9/69), and 13.8% (9/65) in Groups 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5, respectively. The median (25th and 75th quartiles) consumption of norepinephrine was 4 (0-4) μg, 0 (0-0) μg, and 0 (0-0) μg across the groups, respectively; there was a significant difference among the groups (p = 0.0006). The incidence of hypertension was 15.7% (11/72), 5.8% (4/69), and 6.2% (4/65) across the groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In summary, under the conditions of this study, we propose that 1.0 mg/kg lidocaine may be considered as an optimal dose when used as an adjuvant to propofol-remifentanil for endotracheal intubation.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry number: ChiCTR2400092990 https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=231367.