American journal of veterinary research · 2025
Different dexmedetomidine combinations with sevoflurane, ketamine, or propofol lead to varying clinical and laboratory outcomes in rabbits.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Akçalı Burak, Yönez Muhammed Kaan, Alpman Umut
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and laboratory effects of dexmedetomidine + ketamine + sevoflurane (group 1), dexmedetomidine + propofol + sevoflurane (group 2), and dexmedetomidine + total IV propofol (group 3) anesthesia protocols and to introduce a safe anesthesia protocol to the literature and clinical practice.
METHODS: New Zealand white rabbits, which were preclinically examined and determined to be healthy, were included in the study. In accordance with the study protocol, the rabbits were randomly assigned to three different groups, demonstrating that the study was structured as a randomized controlled experimental trial comparing three anesthetic protocols.
RESULTS: A total of 24 rabbits (12 male, 12 female) were randomly divided into 3 different groups of 4 females and 4 males/group. Regarding vital signs, a decrease in pulse, respiration, and body temperature was observed in all groups. The difference in blood gas values between the groups was significant. Regarding hemogram parameters, similar effects were observed in all groups. A significant difference in glucose, AST, and albumin values related to biochemical parameters was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: All of the anesthesia protocols employed in this experimental study induced adequate anesthesia in rabbits without resulting in any serious complications or mortality.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings may assist in selecting anesthetic protocols in rabbits by balancing intraoperative stability and quality of recovery. The results are applicable to both clinical and experimental veterinary settings.
METHODS: New Zealand white rabbits, which were preclinically examined and determined to be healthy, were included in the study. In accordance with the study protocol, the rabbits were randomly assigned to three different groups, demonstrating that the study was structured as a randomized controlled experimental trial comparing three anesthetic protocols.
RESULTS: A total of 24 rabbits (12 male, 12 female) were randomly divided into 3 different groups of 4 females and 4 males/group. Regarding vital signs, a decrease in pulse, respiration, and body temperature was observed in all groups. The difference in blood gas values between the groups was significant. Regarding hemogram parameters, similar effects were observed in all groups. A significant difference in glucose, AST, and albumin values related to biochemical parameters was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: All of the anesthesia protocols employed in this experimental study induced adequate anesthesia in rabbits without resulting in any serious complications or mortality.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings may assist in selecting anesthetic protocols in rabbits by balancing intraoperative stability and quality of recovery. The results are applicable to both clinical and experimental veterinary settings.