Critical care (London, England) · 2025
Hypnosis for unplanned procedural pain in the intensive care unit: the HYPIC randomized clinical trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maamar Adel, Faleur Claude, Pedrono Kristell, Adeux Marie-Pierre, Anne Magali, Verdes Adeline, Fillâtre Pierre, Debarre Matthieu, Mercier Nathalie, Revest Matthieu, Massart Nicolas, Poilvet Noémie, Terzi Nicolas, Tadié Jean-Marc, Gacouin Arnaud, Laviolle Bruno
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pain and anxiety are frequent among critically ill patients undergoing unplanned invasive procedures, and pharmacological pain relief is not always possible. Although hypnosis is widely used in planned painful procedures, studies are lacking in this specific setting. Thus, we aimed to assess whether hypnosis plus standard care reduced pain and anxiety in critically ill patients undergoing an unplanned invasive procedure in comparison to standard care.
METHODS: The HYPIC trial was a randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial of hypnosis during unplanned invasive procedures versus standard care for critically ill patients conducted in two French intensive care units (ICUs) from December 27, 2019, to January 25, 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to receive hypnosis plus standard care by trained healthcare providers or standard care. The hypnotherapists were in the room for both arms to maintain blindness. The primary endpoint was the difference in pain level experienced during the invasive procedure assessed immediately after the end of the procedure between the two groups. The secondary outcomes were anxiety level, lidocaine consumption and stress experienced by the ICU nurses in charge of the patients.
RESULTS: We included 78 patients. The pain level, assessed with a numeric pain scale (range, 0-10), was not significantly different between the two groups (2.2 ± 2.9 vs. 2.2 ± 3, difference 0 pts [95% CI -1.3; 1.3], p = 0.89). The level of anxiety was significantly lower in the hypnosis group (2.4 ± 2.8 vs. 4.1 ± 3, difference - 1.7 [-3; -0.4], p = 0.01), as was the level of stress experienced by the ICU nurses (0.1 ± 0.4 vs. 0.9 ± 1.5, difference - 0.8 [-1.3;-0.3], p = 0.003), and the patients were three times less likely to require increased lidocaine consumption (odds ratio: 0.3 [0.13-0.84], p = 0.02) in the hypnosis group.
CONCLUSION: While hypnosis did not result in a statistically significant reduction in unplanned procedural pain, it seems to reduce anxiety, increase comfort, and reduce the stress level of healthcare providers.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04129333) on 14 October 2019, before the first patient was enrolled.
METHODS: The HYPIC trial was a randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial of hypnosis during unplanned invasive procedures versus standard care for critically ill patients conducted in two French intensive care units (ICUs) from December 27, 2019, to January 25, 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to receive hypnosis plus standard care by trained healthcare providers or standard care. The hypnotherapists were in the room for both arms to maintain blindness. The primary endpoint was the difference in pain level experienced during the invasive procedure assessed immediately after the end of the procedure between the two groups. The secondary outcomes were anxiety level, lidocaine consumption and stress experienced by the ICU nurses in charge of the patients.
RESULTS: We included 78 patients. The pain level, assessed with a numeric pain scale (range, 0-10), was not significantly different between the two groups (2.2 ± 2.9 vs. 2.2 ± 3, difference 0 pts [95% CI -1.3; 1.3], p = 0.89). The level of anxiety was significantly lower in the hypnosis group (2.4 ± 2.8 vs. 4.1 ± 3, difference - 1.7 [-3; -0.4], p = 0.01), as was the level of stress experienced by the ICU nurses (0.1 ± 0.4 vs. 0.9 ± 1.5, difference - 0.8 [-1.3;-0.3], p = 0.003), and the patients were three times less likely to require increased lidocaine consumption (odds ratio: 0.3 [0.13-0.84], p = 0.02) in the hypnosis group.
CONCLUSION: While hypnosis did not result in a statistically significant reduction in unplanned procedural pain, it seems to reduce anxiety, increase comfort, and reduce the stress level of healthcare providers.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04129333) on 14 October 2019, before the first patient was enrolled.