MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000210082

Медицинская библиотека · Nephron. Clinical practice · 2009

Coronary calcium score in renal transplant recipients.

Bubenicek Petr, Kautznerova Dana, Sotornik Ivo, Adamec Milos, Lanska Vera, Teplan Vladimir

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Coronary calcium score (CCS) is established as an index for the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). The aim of this prospective study was to assess changes in CCS in patients 1 year after kidney transplantation (KTx).

METHOD: A total of 221 consecutive renal transplant recipients were enrolled in our prospective study (140 males/81 females). CCS was analyzed by spiral multidetector CT at baseline and 1 year after KTx. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the lumbar spine (L-BMD) and femur (F-BMD).

RESULTS

The mean CCS was 539 +/- 1,033 at baseline. 33% of the patients had a CCS of 0, and 33% of patients had a CCS of >401. A negative correlation was found between F-BMD and CCS, but no correlation was found between L-BMD and CCS. Using CCS, a positive correlation was found between total cholesterol and the age of patients, but no correlation of CCS was found with other biochemical markers of bone and lipid metabolism. One year after transplantation, the mean CCS was 703 +/- 1,253; in 75% of patients the CCS was the same and 25% had a higher CCS.

CONCLUSION

A high risk of CHD was found in 33% of renal graft recipients. No improvement in CCS was found 1 year after KTx.

Для цитирования: Bubenicek Petr, Kautznerova Dana, Sotornik Ivo, Adamec Milos, Lanska Vera, Teplan Vladimir. Coronary calcium score in renal transplant recipients.. Nephron. Clinical practice. 2009. DOI: 10.1159/000210082.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.