DOI 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181656998
Bilateral simultaneous facial nerve palsy: clinical analysis in seven cases.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To analyze clinical manifestations and prognosis of bilateral simultaneous facial nerve palsy (BS-FNP).
STUDY
DESIGN
: Retrospective case review with current follow-up wherever possible.
SETTING
: Tertiary referral centers.
PATIENTS: Patients (n = 7; 4 women and 3 men; mean age, 37 yr; range, 18-58 yr) diagnosed with BS-FNP at the time of their first visit.
INTERVENTION: Therapy with systemic corticosteroids and antiviral agents and outpatient follow-up for 1 month to 4 years after discharge.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Assessment of recovery from FNP using the House-Brackmann grading system.
RESULTS
: The occurrence rate of BS-FNP of total FNP cases for the past 10 years was 0.4%. All patients showed palsy more severe than House-Brackmann Grade IV and similar grades of FNP bilaterally. Patients complained of the involvement of the other side within 1 to 6 days of the involvement of 1 side (mean period, 3.4 d). Bell's palsy was the most common cause (5 of 7; 71.4%), the other 2 being infectious mononucleosis and Ramsay Hunt syndrome zoster sine herpete (1 of 7; 14.3% each). Although most patients recovered completely within 1 to 6 months, 1 with a positive Varicella zoster virus immunoglobulin M titer showed bilateral House-Brackmann Grade II FNP after recovery. No recurrence was noted during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSION
Bell's palsy is the most common cause of BS-FNP in authors' centers. Although BS-FNP may show more severe paralysis, the overall prognosis in most cases is as good as that in unilateral FNP, excluding life-threatening or traumatic cases. Differential diagnosis is very important because the treatment outcome of BS-FNP depends on the cause.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.