MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00192-020-04522-y

Медицинская библиотека · International urogynecology journal · 2020

A systematic review comparing early with late removal of indwelling urinary catheters after pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Xie Nansha, Hu Zeyin, Ye Zengjie, Xu Qiong, Chen Jie, Lin Yan

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

An indwelling catheter is routinely used after pelvic organ prolapse surgery to prevent urinary retention. However, the timing of catheter removal remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the optimal timing of catheter removal following prolapse surgery.

METHODS

Electronic databases including the Cochrane Center Controlled Test Center, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science and CNKI were searched up to January 2010. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different timings of catheter removal after prolapse surgery were eligible. Results from RCTs comparing early versus late removal were pooled, and different durations of catheterization were divided into three sub-comparisons (≤ 2 days versus > 2 days; ≤ 1 day versus 2 days; < 1 day versus 1 day). Primary outcomes were urinary tract infection (UTI) and re-catheterization. Secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with 964 women were involved in the analysis. Early catheter removal was associated with a reduced incidence of UTI (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.9) but an increased risk of re-catheterization (RR 2.67, 95% CI 1.6 to 4.48). Significant differences in primary outcomes were found in the sub-comparison of ≤ 2 days versus > 2 days. Three of six trials found a significantly shorter length of hospital stay in the early removal group. The results for postoperative pain were mixed.

CONCLUSION

Among patients following pelvic organ prolapse surgery, early catheter removal is preferred. Moreover, the timing for removal is preferably within 2 days postoperatively.

Для цитирования: Xie Nansha, Hu Zeyin, Ye Zengjie, Xu Qiong, Chen Jie, Lin Yan. A systematic review comparing early with late removal of indwelling urinary catheters after pelvic organ prolapse surgery.. International urogynecology journal. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04522-y.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.