Journal of anesthesia · 2020
Efficacy of a novel urinary catheter for men with a local anesthetic injection port for catheter-related bladder discomfort: a randomized controlled study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Imai Hidekazu, Seino Yutaka, Baba Hiroshi
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The NMOC-3WAY catheter® is a novel urinary catheter for men that can be used to inject a local anesthetic into the urethra. We sought to assess whether the injection of a local anesthetic into the urethra via the NMOC-3WAY catheter® would reduce catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).
METHODS: Adult male patients who underwent elective EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms were randomly assigned to the 2% lidocaine group and the normal saline group (control group). CRBD was evaluated at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of CRBD at 0 h after surgery.
RESULTS: Data for 37 patients (19 in the lidocaine group and 18 in the control group) were analyzed. CRBD was observed at 0 h in six patients (31.6%; mild, n = 5; moderate, n = 1) in the lidocaine group and in five patients (27.8%; mild, n = 1; moderate, n = 3; severe, n = 1) in the control group. The control group showed a tendency to have severe CRBD at 0 h, although there was no significant difference in either the incidence (P = 0.80) or severity (P = 0.21) of CRBD between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the use of the NMOC-3WAY catheter® for the injection of 2% lidocaine into the urethra does not reduce the incidence of CRBD immediately after EVAR. However, it may reduce moderate or severe CRBD that may lead to postoperative distress and agitation.
METHODS: Adult male patients who underwent elective EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysms were randomly assigned to the 2% lidocaine group and the normal saline group (control group). CRBD was evaluated at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of CRBD at 0 h after surgery.
RESULTS: Data for 37 patients (19 in the lidocaine group and 18 in the control group) were analyzed. CRBD was observed at 0 h in six patients (31.6%; mild, n = 5; moderate, n = 1) in the lidocaine group and in five patients (27.8%; mild, n = 1; moderate, n = 3; severe, n = 1) in the control group. The control group showed a tendency to have severe CRBD at 0 h, although there was no significant difference in either the incidence (P = 0.80) or severity (P = 0.21) of CRBD between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the use of the NMOC-3WAY catheter® for the injection of 2% lidocaine into the urethra does not reduce the incidence of CRBD immediately after EVAR. However, it may reduce moderate or severe CRBD that may lead to postoperative distress and agitation.