Reproductive biomedicine online · 2020
A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing two different treatments of intrauterine adhesions.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Huang Xiao-Wan, Lin Meng-Meng, Zhao Hong-Qin, Powell Martin, Wang Yuan-Qiu, Zheng Ru-Ru, Ellis Laura Burney, Xia Wei-Ting, Lin Feng
Аннотация
RESEARCH QUESTION: Intrauterine adhesions (IUA) are primarily caused by trauma to the endometrium, and hysteroscopy is presently the main treatment for IUA. However, high rates of post-operative adhesion re-formation remain a problem. In this study, the combination of an intrauterine device (IUD) with a Foley catheter and the balloon uterine stent were investigated to evaluate their efficacy in preventing adhesion re-formation and the subsequent reproductive outcomes in patients with moderate to severe adhesions.
DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in a university-affiliated hospital. A total of 171 women with Asherman's syndrome were initially recruited between August 2016 and December 2017 and were randomized to undergo either balloon uterine stent insertion or placement of a contraceptive IUD plus a Foley catheter after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Reduction of adhesion scores, incidence of adhesion re-formation, changes in menstrual flow and reproductive outcomes were analysed.
RESULTS: A total of 118 participants were eligible for analysis. The American Fertility Society (AFS) scores were not significantly different between groups before hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. At the second-look hysteroscopy, the AFS scores and adhesion recurrence rates were significantly higher in the balloon uterine stent group compared with the combination group (P < 0.01 and P = 0.024, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in pregnancy and live birth rates between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of an IUD and a Foley balloon catheter had better efficacy in preventing adhesion re-formation than the balloon uterine stent alone; however, it did not produce better reproductive outcomes.
DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in a university-affiliated hospital. A total of 171 women with Asherman's syndrome were initially recruited between August 2016 and December 2017 and were randomized to undergo either balloon uterine stent insertion or placement of a contraceptive IUD plus a Foley catheter after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. Reduction of adhesion scores, incidence of adhesion re-formation, changes in menstrual flow and reproductive outcomes were analysed.
RESULTS: A total of 118 participants were eligible for analysis. The American Fertility Society (AFS) scores were not significantly different between groups before hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. At the second-look hysteroscopy, the AFS scores and adhesion recurrence rates were significantly higher in the balloon uterine stent group compared with the combination group (P < 0.01 and P = 0.024, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in pregnancy and live birth rates between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of an IUD and a Foley balloon catheter had better efficacy in preventing adhesion re-formation than the balloon uterine stent alone; however, it did not produce better reproductive outcomes.