Acta chirurgica Belgica · 2020
Prophylactic ureteral catheterization in the intraoperative diagnosis of iatrogenic ureteral injury.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dumont Sander, Chys Brecht, Meuleman Christel, Verbeke Geert, Joniau Steven, Van der Aa Frank
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic ureteral injury (IUI) is a rare but feared complication in pelvic surgery. Prophylactic ureteral catheterization (PUC) is inconsistently used to reduce this risk, however no strong evidence exists for this practice. The objective is to investigate whether prophylactic ureteral catheterization can enhance intraoperative detection of IUI and reduce associated patient morbidity.
METHODS: The database of our tertiary referral hospital was retrospectively queried for ureter repairs due to iatrogenic injuries. The search yielded 845 unique patient files. After application of exclusion criteria and manual review of files, 155 individual cases remained. Statistical analysis was performed on the following parameters: timing of ureteral injury discovery, duration until catheter removal and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Prophylactic ureteral catheterization was able to significantly enhance intraoperative diagnosis of IUI (OR = 5.09; 95%CI = 2.26-11.48). The number needed to treat is 2.6 patients. Furthermore, when the IUI was diagnosed during surgery, a significant reduction in postoperative complications was observed (RR = 0.64; 95%CI = 0.42-0.98).
CONCLUSION: Although the beneficial effects of PUC on IUI incidence remain controversial, when a ureteral injury occurs during pelvic surgery, the presence of prophylactic ureteral catheters can significantly reduce both diagnostic delay and postoperative morbidity. By promoting an immediate repair, ureteral catheterization reduces need for further diagnostics and secondary interventions.
METHODS: The database of our tertiary referral hospital was retrospectively queried for ureter repairs due to iatrogenic injuries. The search yielded 845 unique patient files. After application of exclusion criteria and manual review of files, 155 individual cases remained. Statistical analysis was performed on the following parameters: timing of ureteral injury discovery, duration until catheter removal and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Prophylactic ureteral catheterization was able to significantly enhance intraoperative diagnosis of IUI (OR = 5.09; 95%CI = 2.26-11.48). The number needed to treat is 2.6 patients. Furthermore, when the IUI was diagnosed during surgery, a significant reduction in postoperative complications was observed (RR = 0.64; 95%CI = 0.42-0.98).
CONCLUSION: Although the beneficial effects of PUC on IUI incidence remain controversial, when a ureteral injury occurs during pelvic surgery, the presence of prophylactic ureteral catheters can significantly reduce both diagnostic delay and postoperative morbidity. By promoting an immediate repair, ureteral catheterization reduces need for further diagnostics and secondary interventions.