m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
The New Zealand medical journal · 2020

Trial removal of indwelling urinary catheters in stroke patients: a clinical audit at North Shore Hospital.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Rasanathan Dushiyanthi, Wang Xu

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: This is a baseline clinical audit looking at indwelling urinary catheter (IDC) use and trial removal of catheter (TROC) in stroke patients. We collected data on stroke patients admitted to North Shore Hospital between 26 November 2018-24 May 2019, who underwent insertion of an IDC as an inpatient. A minority of patients had TROC within the recommended guideline period. A high incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) was found in this patient population. Insufficient documentation and inappropriate indications for IDC insertion were features noted during this audit. Daily electronic reminders and prompting by all members of the rehabilitation team concerning TROC are important to reduce catheter days and reduce UTI rates.

AIMS: To identify if the trial removal of indwelling urinary catheters (TROC) in stroke patients complies with the 2016 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) AHSA guidelines, and to identify any precipitating factors that prevent compliance with the guidelines.

METHODS: We performed a clinical baseline audit that identified patients who were admitted to the acute stroke ward at North Shore Hospital with a diagnosis of stroke from 26 November 2018-24 May 2019 and had an indwelling urinary catheter (IDC) inserted during their admission. The audit consisted of both retrospective and prospective components. Data was collected on patient demographics, the documented indication for IDC insertion, total number of catheter days, the incidence of UTIs and the outcomes after catheter removal.

RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were included. 4.1% of patients had catheters removed within 24 hours (95% confidence interval: 0.011-0.137). The average number of catheter days before removal of IDC was approximately five days. 24.5% of our patient sample went on to develop a urinary tract infection.

CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient documentation and inappropriate indications for IDC insertion were features noted during this audit. Daily electronic reminders and prompting concerning TROC are important to reduce catheter days and reduce infection rates. Indwelling catheters and associated infections impact the length of hospitalisation, mortality and morbidity of stroke patients.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты