The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2020
Postoperative Urinary Retention in Patients Undergoing Lung Resection: Incidence and Risk Factors.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Merlo Aurelie, Fano Rodrigo, Strassle Paula D, Bui Jenny, Hance Lyla, Teeter Emily, Kolarczyk Lavinia, Haithcock Benjamin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the incidence of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in patients undergoing lung resection at our institution, (2) identify differences in potential risk factors between patients with and without POUR, and (3) describe patient outcomes across POUR status.
METHODS: The medical records of 225 patients between 2016 and 2017 were reviewed, and 191 met criteria for inclusion. The institution's catheterization removal protocol was followed in all patients. Recatheterization was defined as requiring in-and-out catheterization or Foley catheter placement. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests were used for analysis.
RESULTS: POUR developed in 35 patients (18%). Patients with POUR were older (P = .01), had increased baseline creatinine (P = .04), and a higher prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (P = .007). POUR patients were also less likely to get a Foley catheter intraoperatively (P = .0002). Other intraoperative factors, such as surgical approach and extent of resection, were not significantly different between patients with and without POUR. Postoperative factors (epidural use or days with chest tube) were similar. Although patients with POUR were more likely to be discharged with a Foley catheter (13% vs 0%, P = .002), no difference in length of stay, incidences of urinary tract infections, or 30-day readmission were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: POUR develops in approximately 1 in 5 patients undergoing lung resection. Patients with POUR were more likely to not have a Foley catheter placed intraoperatively. However, patients who had POUR did not have worsened patient outcomes (urinary tract infections, length of stay, or 30-day readmission).
METHODS: The medical records of 225 patients between 2016 and 2017 were reviewed, and 191 met criteria for inclusion. The institution's catheterization removal protocol was followed in all patients. Recatheterization was defined as requiring in-and-out catheterization or Foley catheter placement. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon tests were used for analysis.
RESULTS: POUR developed in 35 patients (18%). Patients with POUR were older (P = .01), had increased baseline creatinine (P = .04), and a higher prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (P = .007). POUR patients were also less likely to get a Foley catheter intraoperatively (P = .0002). Other intraoperative factors, such as surgical approach and extent of resection, were not significantly different between patients with and without POUR. Postoperative factors (epidural use or days with chest tube) were similar. Although patients with POUR were more likely to be discharged with a Foley catheter (13% vs 0%, P = .002), no difference in length of stay, incidences of urinary tract infections, or 30-day readmission were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: POUR develops in approximately 1 in 5 patients undergoing lung resection. Patients with POUR were more likely to not have a Foley catheter placed intraoperatively. However, patients who had POUR did not have worsened patient outcomes (urinary tract infections, length of stay, or 30-day readmission).