Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 1992
Amrinone and dobutamine as primary treatment of low cardiac output syndrome following coronary artery surgery: a comparison of their effects on hemodynamics and outcome.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dupuis J Y, Bondy R, Cattran C, Nathan H J, Wynands J E
Аннотация
This study was undertaken in order to compare the effectiveness of amrinone and dobutamine as primary treatment of a low cardiac output (CO) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Thirty patients with preoperative left ventricular dysfunction participated in this open-label randomized study. Patients were included if they failed to separate from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) without inotropic support or if they had a cardiac index (CI) less than 2.4 L/min/m2 after CPB regardless of the blood pressure, in the presence of adequate filling pressures. The treatment objectives were to separate from CPB and achieve a CI > or = 2.4 L/min/m2 and a mean arterial pressure > or = 70 mmHg. Patients treated with amrinone received 0.75 mg/kg followed by 10 micrograms/kg/min; when the objectives were not achieved within five minutes, another 0.75 mg/kg was given. Patients treated with dobutamine received an initial infusion of 5 micrograms/kg/min increased stepwise to 15 micrograms/kg/min if necessary. Eleven of 15 amrinone versus 6 of 15 dobutamine patients achieved the predefined treatment objectives with the test drug alone (P = NS). Comparisons of hemodynamics in patients treated solely with amrinone (n = 7) or dobutamine (n = 6) after CPB showed no significant differences between the treatment groups. The incidence of myocardial ischemia as detected by Holter monitor was 36% with amrinone and 33% with dobutamine. Two patients suffered ventricular fibrillation and two had significant supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (heart rate > 130/min) during treatment with dobutamine alone, whereas no significant arrhythmias occurred in the amrinone group (P = NS). Six dobutamine patients (40%) had postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) as opposed to none among the amrinone patients (P = 0.017). These results indicate that amrinone compares favorably with dobutamine as a primary treatment of low CO after CABG. Further study in a larger number of patients will be required in order to determine if the lower incidence of MI in the amrinone group was due to the treatment drug.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AmrinoneBlood PressureCardiac OutputCardiac Output, LowCardiopulmonary BypassCoronary Artery BypassDobutamineElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial ContractionMyocardial InfarctionOxygen ConsumptionStroke VolumeSyndromeTreatment OutcomeVascular Resistance