Journal of nursing care quality · 2020
Outcomes of a Nurse-Led Difficult Urinary Catheter Team in an Academic Medical Center.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Price David, McKeon Leslie
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Catheter insertion for complex patients by inexperienced nurses can lead to avoidable iatrogenic urethral injury and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI).
PURPOSE: The study aim was to evaluate a comprehensive nurse-led difficult urinary catheterization (DUC) Program to reduce patient CAUTIs.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was used to evaluate the DUC Program's effectiveness during 2013 to 2017. Measures included RN DUC consultations, protocol adherence, patient CAUTIs, and urology consults.
RESULTS: The RN DUC team consulted 435 patients with a 92% insertion success rate. The DUC protocol adherence was 66.1%. Patient CAUTIs decreased from baseline (169) to year 4 (24) (odds ratio: 0.1889, 95% confidence interval = 0.1231-0.2898, P < .001). Urology consults decreased from baseline (40) to year 3 (21), however, increased in year 4 (80) when a urology residency program was started.
CONCLUSION: This comprehensive program was effective in improving catheter insertion technique, eliminating urology consults, and reducing CAUTIs when combined with organizational prevention measures.
PURPOSE: The study aim was to evaluate a comprehensive nurse-led difficult urinary catheterization (DUC) Program to reduce patient CAUTIs.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was used to evaluate the DUC Program's effectiveness during 2013 to 2017. Measures included RN DUC consultations, protocol adherence, patient CAUTIs, and urology consults.
RESULTS: The RN DUC team consulted 435 patients with a 92% insertion success rate. The DUC protocol adherence was 66.1%. Patient CAUTIs decreased from baseline (169) to year 4 (24) (odds ratio: 0.1889, 95% confidence interval = 0.1231-0.2898, P < .001). Urology consults decreased from baseline (40) to year 3 (21), however, increased in year 4 (80) when a urology residency program was started.
CONCLUSION: This comprehensive program was effective in improving catheter insertion technique, eliminating urology consults, and reducing CAUTIs when combined with organizational prevention measures.