Clinical & translational immunology · 2020
Circulating gluten-specific, but not CMV-specific, CD39+ regulatory T cells have an oligoclonal TCR repertoire.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cook Laura, Munier C Mee Ling, Seddiki Nabila, Hardy Melinda Y, Anderson Robert P, Zaunders John, Tye-Din Jason A, Kelleher Anthony D, van Bockel David
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Understanding the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of regulatory CD4+ T-cell (Treg) populations is important for strategies aiming to re-establish tolerance in autoimmune diseases. We studied circulating deamidated gluten-epitope-specific CD39+ Tregs in patients with coeliac disease following an oral gluten challenge, and we used cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD39+ Tregs from healthy controls as a comparator population.
METHODS: We used the OX40 assay to isolate antigen-specific Tregs by induced surface co-expression of CD25, OX40 and CD39. RACE PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing of the TCR β chain were used to analyse repertoire diversity.
RESULTS: We found that, following oral gluten challenge, circulating gluten-specific CD39+ Tregs had an oligoclonal TCR repertoire that contained public clonotypes. Conversely, the TCR repertoire of CMV-epitope-specific CD39+ Tregs from healthy controls was polyclonal.
DISCUSSION: These data indicate that a biased TCR repertoire is not inherent to CD39+ Tregs, and, in this case, is apparently driven by the HLA-DQ2.5-restricted deamidated gluten peptide in coeliac disease patients.
CONCLUSION: This is the first assessment of the TCR repertoire within circulating human Tregs specific for foreign antigen. These data enhance our understanding of antigen-specific CD4+ responses in the settings of chronic inflammation and infection and may help guide immunomonitoring strategies for CD4+ T cell-based therapies, particularly for coeliac disease.
METHODS: We used the OX40 assay to isolate antigen-specific Tregs by induced surface co-expression of CD25, OX40 and CD39. RACE PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing of the TCR β chain were used to analyse repertoire diversity.
RESULTS: We found that, following oral gluten challenge, circulating gluten-specific CD39+ Tregs had an oligoclonal TCR repertoire that contained public clonotypes. Conversely, the TCR repertoire of CMV-epitope-specific CD39+ Tregs from healthy controls was polyclonal.
DISCUSSION: These data indicate that a biased TCR repertoire is not inherent to CD39+ Tregs, and, in this case, is apparently driven by the HLA-DQ2.5-restricted deamidated gluten peptide in coeliac disease patients.
CONCLUSION: This is the first assessment of the TCR repertoire within circulating human Tregs specific for foreign antigen. These data enhance our understanding of antigen-specific CD4+ responses in the settings of chronic inflammation and infection and may help guide immunomonitoring strategies for CD4+ T cell-based therapies, particularly for coeliac disease.