Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
Single- Versus Multiple-sampling Strategy for Blood Cultures in the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis: The Prospective Multicenter UniEndo Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Goehringer François, Soudant Marc, Alauzet Corentine, Selton-Suty Christine, Agrinier Nelly, Virion Jean-Marc, Lefevre Benjamin, Aissa Nejla, Alla François, Ruch Yvon, N'Guyen Yohan, Piroth Lionel, Bouiller Kevin, Royer Pierre-Yves, Le Moing Vincent, Hoen Bruno, Duval Xavier, UniEndo-AEPEI Study group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Single-sampling strategy (SSS) for blood cultures (BCs) has not been evaluated in infective endocarditis (IE). We assessed the diagnostic performance of SSS versus conventional multisampling strategy (MSS) in IE diagnosis.
METHODS: Patients suspected of IE were prospectively enrolled in 8 tertiary-care centers. Five BC bottle pairs were sampled from each patient. Pairs 1, 2, and 3 were sampled simultaneously, followed by 2 additional separate pairs (4 and 5) sampled more than 1 hour later. Pairs 1, 2, and 3 emulated SSS and pairs 1, 4, and 5 emulated MSS. The sensitivity and specificity of the major microbiologic criterion of the 2015 European Society of Cardiology IE diagnostic criteria, based on the SSS and MSS BC results, were calculated using the endocarditis team's diagnosis as the gold standard.
RESULTS: An IE was diagnosed in 101 (39.4%) of the 256 patients enrolled. Sensitivity rates of SSS and MSS were 50.5% (95% CI: 40.7-60.2) and 45.5% (95% CI: 35.8-55.3), respectively (P = .063), whereas specificity rates were 94.8% (95% CI: 91.4-98.3) and 95.5% (95% CI: 92.2-98.8), respectively (P = 1). In IE patients, SSS compared to MSS accurately upgraded the diagnosis from possible to definite IE in 1 patient and downgraded it in none.
CONCLUSIONS: Using SSS to define the major microbiologic criterion was as sensitive and specific as using MSS for diagnosing IE. Using SSS instead of MSS BC results did not lead to erroneous changes in diagnostic class according to the 2015 European Society of Cardiology criteria. Consequently, SSS may be regarded as standard practice for IE diagnosis.
METHODS: Patients suspected of IE were prospectively enrolled in 8 tertiary-care centers. Five BC bottle pairs were sampled from each patient. Pairs 1, 2, and 3 were sampled simultaneously, followed by 2 additional separate pairs (4 and 5) sampled more than 1 hour later. Pairs 1, 2, and 3 emulated SSS and pairs 1, 4, and 5 emulated MSS. The sensitivity and specificity of the major microbiologic criterion of the 2015 European Society of Cardiology IE diagnostic criteria, based on the SSS and MSS BC results, were calculated using the endocarditis team's diagnosis as the gold standard.
RESULTS: An IE was diagnosed in 101 (39.4%) of the 256 patients enrolled. Sensitivity rates of SSS and MSS were 50.5% (95% CI: 40.7-60.2) and 45.5% (95% CI: 35.8-55.3), respectively (P = .063), whereas specificity rates were 94.8% (95% CI: 91.4-98.3) and 95.5% (95% CI: 92.2-98.8), respectively (P = 1). In IE patients, SSS compared to MSS accurately upgraded the diagnosis from possible to definite IE in 1 patient and downgraded it in none.
CONCLUSIONS: Using SSS to define the major microbiologic criterion was as sensitive and specific as using MSS for diagnosing IE. Using SSS instead of MSS BC results did not lead to erroneous changes in diagnostic class according to the 2015 European Society of Cardiology criteria. Consequently, SSS may be regarded as standard practice for IE diagnosis.