Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2025
Validating image-derived input functions of dynamic 18F-FDG long axial field-of-view PET/CT studies.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smith Charlotte L C, Zwezerijnen Gerben J C, den Hollander Marijke E, Greuter Henricus N J M, Gerards Nienke R, Zijlstra Josée, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt C Willemien, Bahce Idris, Yaqub Maqsood, Boellaard Ronald
Аннотация
AIM/BACKGROUND: Dynamic PET imaging requires an input function typically obtained through blood sampling. Image-derived input functions (IDIFs) of the ascending aorta (AA), aortic arch, descending aorta (DA), or left ventricle (LV) offer non-invasive alternatives, especially with long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT systems enabling whole-body dynamic 1⁸F-FDG imaging. This study aimed to validate uncorrected IDIFs derived from the AA, DA, aortic arch, and LV by comparing them to (late) venous whole-blood in patients undergoing LAFOV PET/CT.
METHODS: Eleven oncology patients who underwent 70-min dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT scans on a LAFOV PET/CT system after receiving an intravenous bolus injection of 3.0 MBq/kg were included. Seven venous blood samples were collected manually at approximately 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 45, and 60 min post-injection (pi) and compared to IDIFs derived from the AA, aortic arch, DA, and LV. Bias between IDIFs and venous blood samples was assessed at each time point.
RESULTS: IDIF accuracy relative to venous blood samples improved over time, with a median percentage bias <10% after 25 min pi. At 60 min pi, the aortic arch showed the smallest bias (median -1.1%, IQR 5.9%), followed by the AA (2.5%, IQR 7.0%), DA (5.1%, IQR 8.6%), and LV (7.4%, IQR 7.6%).
CONCLUSION: The high precision of aorta-derived IDIFs suggests that IDIFs are a reliable alternative to manual blood sampling for dynamic 18F-FDG PET imaging on a LAFOV PET/CT system. Using IDIFs reduces variability, simplifies protocols, minimizes radiation exposure, and enhances patient safety with a non-invasive approach.
METHODS: Eleven oncology patients who underwent 70-min dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT scans on a LAFOV PET/CT system after receiving an intravenous bolus injection of 3.0 MBq/kg were included. Seven venous blood samples were collected manually at approximately 5, 10, 15, 25, 35, 45, and 60 min post-injection (pi) and compared to IDIFs derived from the AA, aortic arch, DA, and LV. Bias between IDIFs and venous blood samples was assessed at each time point.
RESULTS: IDIF accuracy relative to venous blood samples improved over time, with a median percentage bias <10% after 25 min pi. At 60 min pi, the aortic arch showed the smallest bias (median -1.1%, IQR 5.9%), followed by the AA (2.5%, IQR 7.0%), DA (5.1%, IQR 8.6%), and LV (7.4%, IQR 7.6%).
CONCLUSION: The high precision of aorta-derived IDIFs suggests that IDIFs are a reliable alternative to manual blood sampling for dynamic 18F-FDG PET imaging on a LAFOV PET/CT system. Using IDIFs reduces variability, simplifies protocols, minimizes radiation exposure, and enhances patient safety with a non-invasive approach.