MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ncq.0000000000000857

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of nursing care quality · 2025

Upper Arm Versus Forearm Placement of Long Peripheral Catheters for Blood Sampling: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Bahl Amit, Drogowski Matthew, Gutta Akhil, Lehman Christopher, Younes Edmond, DiLoreto Emily, Shen Chen

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The impact of site selection on blood sampling and catheter functionality for long peripheral catheters (LPCs) is unclear.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of LPCs placed in the upper arm vs the forearm.

METHODS

A single-site, randomized trial was conducted among adult patients requiring an LPC for difficult venous access or prolonged therapy. Participants were randomized to receive an 8 cm, 20-gauge LPC in either the forearm or upper arm. Outcomes included blood sampling success, catheter survival, and catheter-associated thrombosis.

RESULTS

Among 88 patients, blood sampling failure was common, with no significant difference between forearm (83.3%) and upper arm (78.1%) groups (P = .769). Mean dwell time (74.27 vs 115.52 hours, P = .394) and time to first blood sampling failure (70.19 vs 112.90 hours, P = .359) were similar. While overall blood sampling success and thrombosis rates did not differ, trends favored upper arm placement over time.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no statistically significant differences in blood sampling capability or functionality between placement sites.

Для цитирования: Bahl Amit, Drogowski Matthew, Gutta Akhil, Lehman Christopher, Younes Edmond, DiLoreto Emily, Shen Chen. Upper Arm Versus Forearm Placement of Long Peripheral Catheters for Blood Sampling: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. Journal of nursing care quality. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/ncq.0000000000000857.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.