Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2024
Quantifying sampling method-induced imprecision in user-friendly lateral upper arm blood collection: Introducing σ3-methodology (S3) for the verification of alternative sampling methods with TAP® II as a use case.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Molenaar Vincent J, Villalobos-Quesada María, Njo Tjin L, Chavannes Niels H, Talboom-Kamp Esther P W A, B Kok Maarten
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Alternative means of blood sampling continue to grow due to the scarcity of phlebotomists and the need for person-centered care. It is crucial to consistently support these alternative blood sampling innovations with scientific evidence to guarantee the quality of care, especially when implementing for instance Lateral Upper-arm Blood Collection (LUBC) for use at home. Knowledge gaps remain in how to quantify imprecision introduced by the collection method and its impact on clinical use.
METHODS: We developed the Six Sigma analysis for alternative Sampling methods, including sampling method-induced imprecision, accuracy and precision, called σ3-methodology (S3). We performed a two-step verification using σ3-methodology for LUBC TAP® II, which included fourteen routine clinical analytes. We used venipuncture as the gold standard.
RESULTS: The biggest source of imprecision for all analytes was sampling method-induced imprecision, which, for the first time, was quantified, resulting in a varying effect on the clinical usability. TAP® II showed acceptable analytical performance for ALP, bilirubin, HDL-cholesterol, CRP and sodium. Unacceptable analytical performance was found for ALT, AST, cholesterol, creatinine, GGT, HbA1c, potassium, LDH and triglycerides.
CONCLUSION: Alternative blood sampling innovations hold promise for advancing diagnostic care, aiming to deliver accessible decentralised sample collection at home that does not require phlebotomist involvement. However, sampling method-induced imprecision should not be overlooked in the performance assessment to guarantee responsible development that will contribute to the success and desirable societal impact of alternative sampling technologies.
METHODS: We developed the Six Sigma analysis for alternative Sampling methods, including sampling method-induced imprecision, accuracy and precision, called σ3-methodology (S3). We performed a two-step verification using σ3-methodology for LUBC TAP® II, which included fourteen routine clinical analytes. We used venipuncture as the gold standard.
RESULTS: The biggest source of imprecision for all analytes was sampling method-induced imprecision, which, for the first time, was quantified, resulting in a varying effect on the clinical usability. TAP® II showed acceptable analytical performance for ALP, bilirubin, HDL-cholesterol, CRP and sodium. Unacceptable analytical performance was found for ALT, AST, cholesterol, creatinine, GGT, HbA1c, potassium, LDH and triglycerides.
CONCLUSION: Alternative blood sampling innovations hold promise for advancing diagnostic care, aiming to deliver accessible decentralised sample collection at home that does not require phlebotomist involvement. However, sampling method-induced imprecision should not be overlooked in the performance assessment to guarantee responsible development that will contribute to the success and desirable societal impact of alternative sampling technologies.