The Journal of cardiovascular surgery · 1991
A comparative study of the St. Jude Medical and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave prostheses in isolated valve replacement.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aramendi J I, Castellanos E, Serrano A, Madiedo J B, Ortiz De Salazar A, Agosti J
Аннотация
This is a study of 199 consecutive patients who survived isolated mitral or aortic valve replacement with a Björk-Shiley (B-S) or St. Jude Medical (SJM) prostheses. Mean follow-up was 36 months. Preoperative status was similar for both groups (B-S or SMJ). Five year survival rates for mitral valve replacement (MVR) were 91% for B-S and SJM, and for aortic valve replacement (AVR) 96% vs 91% for SJM (p less than 0.06). Linearized incidence of thromboembolism in MVR was 5.62% patient year for BS and 5.23% patient year for SJM (p = NS). Classical risk factors for thromboembolism were evaluated on a univariate analysis: no single risk factor was identified. Only the association of two or more was possibly significant. The presence of inadequate anticoagulation (prothrombin index greater than 50%) was the main risk factor for thromboembolism, as the incidence rate was 19% per patient year when poorly anticoagulated versus 4.6% per patient year incidence in the whole series (p less than 0.01).