Revista portuguesa de cardiologia : orgao oficial da Sociedade Portuguesa de Cardiologia = Portuguese journal of cardiology : an official journal of the Portuguese Society of Cardiology · 1989
[Flow patterns of a normally functioning monocuspid aortic prosthesis evaluated using Doppler echocardiography].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bernardes L, Abreu J, Matos P, Ramos J M, Quininha J, Salomão S
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Flow analysis in normally functioning eccentric monocuspid aortic prosthetic valves, to obtain a reference data list.
DESIGN: To analyse, using 2D-Doppler Echocardiography, aortic flow velocity and systolic time intervals in clinically normal patients (pts), by physical examination.
SETTING: Referred pts to the Echocardiographic Laboratory at Santa Marta Hospital--HCL.
PATIENTS: Sequential sample of 61 pts with aortic prosthesis (41 Bjork-Shiley and 20 Hall-Kaster) without clinical evidence of either cardiac failure or significant aortic regurgitation. Patients with bad quality record were also excluded.
INTERVENTIONS: Doppler Echocardiography was used to record transaortic flow, and the following indexes were analysed: instantaneous peak velocity (pv) and gradient (pg), presence of regurgitation, systolic time intervals and both preejection period/ejection time (PEP/ET) and acceleration time/ejection time (AT/ET).
RESULTS: Pv ranged from 1.1 to 4 m/sec (mean 2.4 +/- 0.2. The prosthesis size 19 and 21 showed a greater pg compared to the larger ones: 46.3 +/- 14.4 mmHg against 12.6 +/- 6.4 mmHg (p less than 0.001). Occasionally a pg over 50 mmHg was found in the prosthesis size 19 and 21. The correlation between prosthesis size and pg was also significant (r = -0.62; p less than 0.001). PEP interval was 60 +/- 10 milisec in prosthesis no. 19 and 90 +/- 13 milisec in no. 27 (p less than 0.01). AT ranged from 77 +/- 14 to 88 +/- 14 milisec (mean 82 +/- 13). ET was 294 +/- 5.4 milisec in valves size 19 and 257 +/- 34 millisec in no. 25 (p less than 0.05); there was also a significant difference between prosthesis size 19 and 27 (p less than 0.05). Mild regurgitation was detected in 32.7% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: These data may be particularly useful as reference values to the follow-up of pts these types of prosthesis. Significant differences were found in pg between different valve sizes and this should be remembered when proceeding to standard evaluation by 2D-Doppler Echocardiography. Regurgitation is frequently detected in normally functioning prosthesis, not deeper than 2 cm in the left ventricle.
DESIGN: To analyse, using 2D-Doppler Echocardiography, aortic flow velocity and systolic time intervals in clinically normal patients (pts), by physical examination.
SETTING: Referred pts to the Echocardiographic Laboratory at Santa Marta Hospital--HCL.
PATIENTS: Sequential sample of 61 pts with aortic prosthesis (41 Bjork-Shiley and 20 Hall-Kaster) without clinical evidence of either cardiac failure or significant aortic regurgitation. Patients with bad quality record were also excluded.
INTERVENTIONS: Doppler Echocardiography was used to record transaortic flow, and the following indexes were analysed: instantaneous peak velocity (pv) and gradient (pg), presence of regurgitation, systolic time intervals and both preejection period/ejection time (PEP/ET) and acceleration time/ejection time (AT/ET).
RESULTS: Pv ranged from 1.1 to 4 m/sec (mean 2.4 +/- 0.2. The prosthesis size 19 and 21 showed a greater pg compared to the larger ones: 46.3 +/- 14.4 mmHg against 12.6 +/- 6.4 mmHg (p less than 0.001). Occasionally a pg over 50 mmHg was found in the prosthesis size 19 and 21. The correlation between prosthesis size and pg was also significant (r = -0.62; p less than 0.001). PEP interval was 60 +/- 10 milisec in prosthesis no. 19 and 90 +/- 13 milisec in no. 27 (p less than 0.01). AT ranged from 77 +/- 14 to 88 +/- 14 milisec (mean 82 +/- 13). ET was 294 +/- 5.4 milisec in valves size 19 and 257 +/- 34 millisec in no. 25 (p less than 0.05); there was also a significant difference between prosthesis size 19 and 27 (p less than 0.05). Mild regurgitation was detected in 32.7% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: These data may be particularly useful as reference values to the follow-up of pts these types of prosthesis. Significant differences were found in pg between different valve sizes and this should be remembered when proceeding to standard evaluation by 2D-Doppler Echocardiography. Regurgitation is frequently detected in normally functioning prosthesis, not deeper than 2 cm in the left ventricle.