MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2013

[Correlation analysis of subjective and objective scoring of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps].

Chen Yu-tan, Cao Jin-hong, Liang Geng-tian, Li Yan-ni

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship of of subjective and objective scoring chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

METHODS

The clinical data of 159 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis were analyzed. SPSS 18.0 software was used to analyze the data. Pearson regression was used to analyze the relationship.

RESULTS

The Pearson correlation coefficient r between VAS score (16.380 ± 5.809)and the whole discomfort (5.070 ± 1.361) was 0.710, there were correlation (P < 0.01). The Pearson correlation coefficient r between Lund-Kennedy score (3.724 ± 1.107) and Lund-Mackay score (5.983 ± 2.984) was 0.513, there were correlation (P < 0.01). The Pearson correlation coefficient r between VAS score and Lund-Kennedy score was 0.417, there were correlation (P < 0.05). VAS score had no correlation with Lund-Mackay(r = 0.113, P > 0.05). The whole discomfort had no correlation with Lund-Kennedy score and Lund-Mackay score (r value were 0.309 and 0.022, all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The subjective and objective score of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps were contradict sometimes.

Для цитирования: Chen Yu-tan, Cao Jin-hong, Liang Geng-tian, Li Yan-ni. [Correlation analysis of subjective and objective scoring of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps].. Zhonghua er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Chinese journal of otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery. 2013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.