BMC medicine · 2025
When health data go dark: the importance of the DHS Program and imagining its future.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Khaki Jessie Jane, Molenaar Jil, Karki Sulata, Olal Emmanuel, Straneo Manuela, Mosuse Marie Alice, Fouogue Jovanny Tsuala, Hensen Bernadette, Baguiya Adama, Musau Nkola Angèle, Wong Kerry L M, Ba Oumar Aly, Kikula Amani, Grovogui Fassou Mathias, Semaan Aline, Asefa Anteneh, Macharia Peter M, Chikwari Chido Dziva, Ouédraogo Mariame Oumar, Christou Aliki, Okiro Emelda A, Mutua Martin Kavao, Amodu Abioye, Phiri Mwelwa, Athanase Rukundo, Kitara David Lagoro, Owolabi Onikepe, Pembe Andrea B, Afolabi Bosede B, Beňová Lenka
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The suspension and/or termination of many programmes funded through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) by the new US administration has severe short- and long-term negative impacts on the health of people worldwide. We draw attention to the termination of the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) Program, which includes nationally representative surveys of households, DHS, Malaria Indicator Surveys [MIS]) and health facilities (Service Provision Assessments [SPA]) in over 90 low- and middle-income countries. USAID co-funding and provision of technical support for these surveys has been shut down.
MAIN BODY: The impact of these disruptions will reverberate across local, regional, national, and global levels and severely impact the ability to understand the levels and changes in population health outcomes and behaviours. We highlight three key impacts on (1) ongoing data collection and data processing activities; (2) future data collection and consequent lack of population-level health indicators; and (3) access to existing data and lack of support for its use.
CONCLUSIONS: We call for immediate action on multiple fronts. In the short term, universal access to existing data and survey materials should be restored, and surveys which were planned or in progress should be completed. In the long term, this crisis should serve as a tipping point for transforming these vital surveys. We call on national governments, regional organisations, and international partners to develop sustainable alternatives that preserve the principles (standardised questionnaires, backward compatibility, open access data with rigorous documentation) which made the DHS Program an invaluable global health resource.
MAIN BODY: The impact of these disruptions will reverberate across local, regional, national, and global levels and severely impact the ability to understand the levels and changes in population health outcomes and behaviours. We highlight three key impacts on (1) ongoing data collection and data processing activities; (2) future data collection and consequent lack of population-level health indicators; and (3) access to existing data and lack of support for its use.
CONCLUSIONS: We call for immediate action on multiple fronts. In the short term, universal access to existing data and survey materials should be restored, and surveys which were planned or in progress should be completed. In the long term, this crisis should serve as a tipping point for transforming these vital surveys. We call on national governments, regional organisations, and international partners to develop sustainable alternatives that preserve the principles (standardised questionnaires, backward compatibility, open access data with rigorous documentation) which made the DHS Program an invaluable global health resource.