Revista medica de Chile · 1992
[DDD dual chamber pacemakers. Initial experience].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dubernet J, Fajuri A, Serrat H, González R, González J A
Аннотация
Our preliminary experience with dual-chamber DDD pacemakers is reported. Technological innovations of the device, atrio-ventricular electrode stability and sequential stimulation have contributed to improve the conditions of patients previously submitted to VVI pacemaker implantation. Primary indications for DDD pacemaker implantation in our series included 7 patients with complete atrio-ventricular (A-V) block, 3 with Mobitz type II second-degree A-V block and 2 with sick sinus syndrome. In six of the 12 patients (50%) additional indications included: ventricular tachycardia in 4 patients, atrial fibrillation in one and pacemaker syndrome in one. Other cardiac conditions were diagnosed: dilated cardiomyopathy in 3 patients, ischemic heart disease in 2 patients, valvular heart disease in 2 patients, congenital heart disease in 1 patient and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in one patient. The implanted pacemakers were: 5 Genesis, 4 Ultra CPI and 3 Versatrax. J-shaped atrial electrodes were used in 8 patients and in 4 instances a screw-in electrode was employed. Improvement of hemodynamic function was achieved by frequent follow up and reprogramming of DDD pacemaker in every patient. While 4 patients died with progressive deterioration of cardiac function, eight patients survived with adequate sequential stimulation. We conclude that DDD pacemakers are reliable and afford symptomatic relief in a broad spectrum of patients.