MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/resp.12790

Медицинская библиотека · Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2016

Coordination between respiration and swallowing during non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

Hori Ryuji, Isaka Masaaki, Oonishi Kazuhiko, Yabe Toru, Oku Yoshitaka

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the risk of silent aspiration is increased in non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

METHODS

We analysed the coordination between respiration and swallowing, in 12 young volunteers and 10 elder volunteers, by simultaneously monitoring respiratory flow, laryngeal movement and swallowing sound in three different conditions: control, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP). A step-wise multiple regression analysis was performed with the occurrence rate of inspiration after swallows as the dependent variable and various correlated variables as the independent variables.

RESULTS

In both subject groups, the occurrence rate of inspiration after swallow was greater with BiPAP compared with control and CPAP conditions. Repetitive saliva swallowing test count and swallow non-inspiratory flow occurrence rate were extracted as predictor variables for risk of inspiration after swallows during BiPAP treatment.

CONCLUSION

We found that the occurrence rate of inspiration after swallow is increased with BiPAP use irrespective of age. The results suggest that swallow non-inspiratory flow may trigger inspiratory support in the BiPAP mode, resulting in a risk of aspiration.

Для цитирования: Hori Ryuji, Isaka Masaaki, Oonishi Kazuhiko, Yabe Toru, Oku Yoshitaka. Coordination between respiration and swallowing during non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.. Respirology (Carlton, Vic.). 2016. DOI: 10.1111/resp.12790.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.