The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2007
Changes in sarcomeric and non-sarcomeric cytoskeletal proteins and focal adhesion molecules during clinical myocardial recovery after left ventricular assist device support.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Latif Najma, Yacoub Magdi H, George Robert, Barton Paul J R, Birks Emma J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Reverse remodeling can occur after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, which is sufficient in some cases to allow explantation of the device without cardiac transplantation. The molecular mechanisms involved remain unknown. A specific pattern of expression of sarcomeric and non-sarcomeric proteins in the myocardium is thought to be essential for normal myocardial function. However, a detailed protein analysis of their role in recovery has not been performed previously.
METHODS: Myocardial samples were collected at implantation and explantation in 7 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy who had sufficient recovery for device explantation. Western blotting and immunoprobing were used to quantitate changes in the expression of sarcomeric and cytoskeletal proteins.
RESULTS: At implantation, all patients (6 men and 1 woman, age [mean +/- SD] 36.1 +/- 10.4 years) were inotrope-dependent; ejection fraction (EF) was 12.6 +/- 4.6%, cardiac index (CI) was 1.66 +/- 0.5 liters/min/m2 and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was 26 +/- 6 mm Hg. Mean duration of LVAD support was 333 +/- 235 days. Prior to explantation, EF (pump off for 15 minutes) was 62.7 +/- 11.4%, CI was 2.7 +/- 0.7 liters/min/m2 and PCWP was 10.9 +/- 3.5 mm Hg. At explantation, the following statistically significant increases were noted: myosin heavy chain, 1.90-fold (p < 0.05); sarcomeric actin, 1.80-fold (p < 0.05); alphaII spectrin, 1.40-fold (p = 0.05); troponin C, 1.34-fold (p < 0.05); troponin T, 2.10-fold (p < 0.05); cytoskeletal actinin, 5.16-fold (p < 0.05); and smooth muscle alpha-actin, 4.10-fold (p = 0.05). Although not significant (NS), increases were also seen for: troponin I, 1.27-fold; myosin light chain 1, 1.28-fold; tropomyosin, 1.28-fold; and sarcomeric actinin at 3.24-fold. There was a decrease in talin of 2.01-fold (p = NS) between implant and explant. Vimentin was unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that reverse remodeling of the myocardium parallels improvements in hemodynamic function in LVAD patients showing clinical myocardial recovery.
METHODS: Myocardial samples were collected at implantation and explantation in 7 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy who had sufficient recovery for device explantation. Western blotting and immunoprobing were used to quantitate changes in the expression of sarcomeric and cytoskeletal proteins.
RESULTS: At implantation, all patients (6 men and 1 woman, age [mean +/- SD] 36.1 +/- 10.4 years) were inotrope-dependent; ejection fraction (EF) was 12.6 +/- 4.6%, cardiac index (CI) was 1.66 +/- 0.5 liters/min/m2 and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was 26 +/- 6 mm Hg. Mean duration of LVAD support was 333 +/- 235 days. Prior to explantation, EF (pump off for 15 minutes) was 62.7 +/- 11.4%, CI was 2.7 +/- 0.7 liters/min/m2 and PCWP was 10.9 +/- 3.5 mm Hg. At explantation, the following statistically significant increases were noted: myosin heavy chain, 1.90-fold (p < 0.05); sarcomeric actin, 1.80-fold (p < 0.05); alphaII spectrin, 1.40-fold (p = 0.05); troponin C, 1.34-fold (p < 0.05); troponin T, 2.10-fold (p < 0.05); cytoskeletal actinin, 5.16-fold (p < 0.05); and smooth muscle alpha-actin, 4.10-fold (p = 0.05). Although not significant (NS), increases were also seen for: troponin I, 1.27-fold; myosin light chain 1, 1.28-fold; tropomyosin, 1.28-fold; and sarcomeric actinin at 3.24-fold. There was a decrease in talin of 2.01-fold (p = NS) between implant and explant. Vimentin was unchanged.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that reverse remodeling of the myocardium parallels improvements in hemodynamic function in LVAD patients showing clinical myocardial recovery.