Clinical oral investigations · 2015
Cementoblastic lineage formation in the cross-talk between stem cells of human exfoliated deciduous teeth and epithelial rests of Malassez cells.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Farea Manal, Husein Adam, Halim Ahmad Sukari, Berahim Zurairah, Nurul Asma Abdullah, Mokhtar Khairani Idah, Mokhtar Kasmawati
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the synergistic effect of epithelial rests of Malassez cells (ERM) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) on proliferation, cementogenic and osteogenic differentiation of stem cells derived from human exfoliated deciduous teeth (SHED).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: SHED were co-cultured with ERM with/without TGF-β1. Then, SHED proliferation, morphological appearance, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, mineralization behaviour and gene/protein expression of cemento/osteoblastic phenotype were evaluated.
RESULTS: TGF-β1 enhanced SHED proliferation when either cultured alone or co-cultured with ERM. ERM induced the cementoblastic differentiation of SHED which was significantly accelerated when treated with TGF-β1. This activity was demonstrated by high ALP activity, strong mineral deposition and upregulation of cementum/bone-related gene and protein expressions (i.e. ALP, collagen type I, bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin and cementum attachment protein).
CONCLUSIONS: ERM were able to induce SHED differentiation along the cemento/osteoblastic lineage that was triggered in the presence of TGF-β1.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The cemento/osteoblastic differentiation capability of SHED possesses a therapeutic potential in endodontic and periodontal tissue engineering.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: SHED were co-cultured with ERM with/without TGF-β1. Then, SHED proliferation, morphological appearance, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, mineralization behaviour and gene/protein expression of cemento/osteoblastic phenotype were evaluated.
RESULTS: TGF-β1 enhanced SHED proliferation when either cultured alone or co-cultured with ERM. ERM induced the cementoblastic differentiation of SHED which was significantly accelerated when treated with TGF-β1. This activity was demonstrated by high ALP activity, strong mineral deposition and upregulation of cementum/bone-related gene and protein expressions (i.e. ALP, collagen type I, bone sialoprotein, osteocalcin and cementum attachment protein).
CONCLUSIONS: ERM were able to induce SHED differentiation along the cemento/osteoblastic lineage that was triggered in the presence of TGF-β1.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The cemento/osteoblastic differentiation capability of SHED possesses a therapeutic potential in endodontic and periodontal tissue engineering.