MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/0301-4738.121131

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2014

Clinical profile and short-term outcomes of optic neuritis patients in India.

Saxena Rohit, Phuljhele Swati, Menon Vimla, Gadaginamath Shailesh, Sinha Ankur, Sharma Pradeep

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical profile and short-term visual outcome of optic neuritis (ON) patients in India.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

In this prospective study carried out over a period of 3 years, 99 eyes of 83 ON patients were examined and followed up for 10.8 ± 8.2 months for type of presentation, recurrence rate, and visual outcome.

RESULTS

Mean age was 27.6 ± 8.8 years. Female preponderance was seen (70% of cases). Papillitis (53.5% of eyes) was more common than retrobulbar neuritis (46.5% of eyes). Bilateral presentation was seen in 19.3% cases. Baseline median logMAR visual acuity (VA) was 1.6 ± 0.8, which improved to 0.2 ± 0.6, with approximately 64% of eyes retaining VA of 20/40 or more. Two patients had previous diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). MS was newly diagnosed in two patients. Recurrence was seen in 16% of eyes and was more common in cases of retrobulbar neuritis.

CONCLUSION

The clinical profile of ON in Indian patients is different from that in the Western population. Unlike reported in the Western literature, papillitis is frequent in the Indian setup, with lower recurrence rates but poorer outcomes.

Для цитирования: Saxena Rohit, Phuljhele Swati, Menon Vimla, Gadaginamath Shailesh, Sinha Ankur, Sharma Pradeep. Clinical profile and short-term outcomes of optic neuritis patients in India.. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2014. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.121131.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.