MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2000

Parastomal pyoderma gangrenosum: clinical features and management.

Lyon C C, Smith A J, Beck M H, Wong G A, Griffiths C E

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The importance of pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) as a cause of ulceration around abdominal stomas is not well recognized.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to describe the incidence, clinical and histologic features, disease associations, and possible risk factors for parastomal PG.

METHODS

A clinic, run by a dermatologist and two stoma nurses, was created. Five hundred patients approached by postal questionnaire were invited to attend if they had skin problems. In addition, local surgical, dermatologic, and nursing services were invited to refer patients with parastomal skin problems. Cases of parastomal PG were identified, investigated, and treated.

RESULTS

The annual incidence of parastomal PG in the questionnaire-based cohort of patients was 0.6% (3 patients). An additional 23 patients with the condition were seen. No consistent hematologic, biochemical, immunologic, microbiological or histologic abnormalities were identified. Local skin damage did not appear to be an important trigger for parastomal PG. The condition is recurrent in one third of cases. Topical tacrolimus (0.3% in carmellose sodium paste) has been effective in 4 patients.

CONCLUSION

Parastomal PG is far more common than previous reports would suggest, and it may be associated with diseases other than inflammatory bowel disease.

Для цитирования: Lyon C C, Smith A J, Beck M H, Wong G A, Griffiths C E. Parastomal pyoderma gangrenosum: clinical features and management.. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2000.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.