Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022
The prognostic significance of bundle branch block in acute heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
МетаанализСистематический обзорСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aguiló Oriol, Castells Xavier, Miró Òscar, Mueller Christian, Chioncel Ovidiu, Trullàs Joan Carles
Аннотация
AIMS: The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of prospective studies assessing the relationship between bundle branch block (BBB) or wide QRS and risk of all-cause mortality in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).
METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science database from inception to February 2022 to identify single centre or multicentre studies including a minimum of 400 patients and assessing the association between BBB or wide QRS and mortality in patients with AHF. Study-specific hazard ratio (HR) estimates were combined using a random-effects meta-analysis. Two meta-analyses were performed: (1) grouping by conduction disturbance and follow-up length and, (2) using the results from the longest follow-up for each study and grouping by the type of BBB. The meta-analysis included 21 publications with a total of 116,928 patients. Wide QRS (considering right (RBBB) and left (LBBB) altogether) was associated with a significant increment in the risk of all-cause mortality (pooled adjusted HR 1.112, 95% CI 1.065-1.160). The increased risk of death was also present when LBBB (HR 1.121, 95% CI 1.042-1.207) and RBBB (HR 1.187, 95% CI 1.045-1.348) were considered individually. There was no difference in risk between LBBB and RBBB (P for interaction = 0.533). Other outcomes including sudden death, rehospitalization and a combination of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization were also increased in patients with BBB or wide QRS.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests a modest increase in the risk of all-cause mortality among patients with AHF and BBB or wide QRS, irrespective of the type of BBB.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched the PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science database from inception to February 2022 to identify single centre or multicentre studies including a minimum of 400 patients and assessing the association between BBB or wide QRS and mortality in patients with AHF. Study-specific hazard ratio (HR) estimates were combined using a random-effects meta-analysis. Two meta-analyses were performed: (1) grouping by conduction disturbance and follow-up length and, (2) using the results from the longest follow-up for each study and grouping by the type of BBB. The meta-analysis included 21 publications with a total of 116,928 patients. Wide QRS (considering right (RBBB) and left (LBBB) altogether) was associated with a significant increment in the risk of all-cause mortality (pooled adjusted HR 1.112, 95% CI 1.065-1.160). The increased risk of death was also present when LBBB (HR 1.121, 95% CI 1.042-1.207) and RBBB (HR 1.187, 95% CI 1.045-1.348) were considered individually. There was no difference in risk between LBBB and RBBB (P for interaction = 0.533). Other outcomes including sudden death, rehospitalization and a combination of cardiovascular death or rehospitalization were also increased in patients with BBB or wide QRS.
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests a modest increase in the risk of all-cause mortality among patients with AHF and BBB or wide QRS, irrespective of the type of BBB.