Journal of electrocardiology · 2022
Estimation of the QTc interval in the presence of right bundle branch block: A comparative study using validated formulae for left bundle branch block.
Наблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
García-Izquierdo Eusebio, García-Gómez Sergio, Aguilera-Agudo Cristina, De Castro-Campos Daniel, García-Rodríguez Daniel, Fajardo-Simón Lourdes, Veloza-Urrea Darwin, Segura-Domínguez Melodie, Jiménez-Sánchez Diego, Castro-Urda Victor, Toquero-Ramos Jorge, Fernández-Lozano Ignacio
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Adequate measurement of the QT interval is of clinical importance in order to identify patients at higher risk for ventricular arrhythmias. Previous studies have described different methods to estimate baseline QT in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, the evidence regarding the assessment of the QT in patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) is scarce.
AIM: To analyze the feasibility and reliability of the different formulae described for LBBB in the estimation of the baseline QT in the presence of RBBB.
METHODS: We performed an observational study including patients who underwent electrophysiology study and/or ablation. Two types of RBBB were considered: 1) pacing-induced and 2) transient true RBBB. QRS, JT and QT intervals were measured during baseline and RBBB. Estimated QTc was calculated using LBBB formulae: Bogossian, Rautaharju, Tabatabaei, Tang-Rabkin, Yankelson, Wang. Linear correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess the reliability of these formulae for the estimation of baseline QTc.
RESULTS: We finally included a total of 100 patients. Correlations between baseline and estimated QTc were strong (R > 0.7) for all the formulae except for Tabatabaei. Yankelson and Wang showed the highest reliability (ICC = 0.775 and 0.727, respectively). Yankelson appeared to be the most accurate formula, with a mean estimated QTc closest to baseline values.
CONCLUSION: Previously described formulae for LBBB exhibited marked differences regarding reliability in the estimation of the QTc interval in the presence of RBBB. According to our results, Yankelson showed the most consistent and accurate agreement in this setting.
AIM: To analyze the feasibility and reliability of the different formulae described for LBBB in the estimation of the baseline QT in the presence of RBBB.
METHODS: We performed an observational study including patients who underwent electrophysiology study and/or ablation. Two types of RBBB were considered: 1) pacing-induced and 2) transient true RBBB. QRS, JT and QT intervals were measured during baseline and RBBB. Estimated QTc was calculated using LBBB formulae: Bogossian, Rautaharju, Tabatabaei, Tang-Rabkin, Yankelson, Wang. Linear correlation and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess the reliability of these formulae for the estimation of baseline QTc.
RESULTS: We finally included a total of 100 patients. Correlations between baseline and estimated QTc were strong (R > 0.7) for all the formulae except for Tabatabaei. Yankelson and Wang showed the highest reliability (ICC = 0.775 and 0.727, respectively). Yankelson appeared to be the most accurate formula, with a mean estimated QTc closest to baseline values.
CONCLUSION: Previously described formulae for LBBB exhibited marked differences regarding reliability in the estimation of the QTc interval in the presence of RBBB. According to our results, Yankelson showed the most consistent and accurate agreement in this setting.