Vaccines · 2025
Delayed Cellular Immunity in SARS-CoV-2 Antibody-Non-Responders to COVID-19 Vaccination: Rethinking Post-Vaccine Immune Assessment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nikoloudis Dimitris, Konstantinakou Kanella E, Konstantinidis Alexandros D, Spyrou Natalia I, Vasileiou Irene V, Tsakris Athanasios, Pitiriga Vassiliki C
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: While host immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are routinely assessed through IgG measurements, less is known about the temporal dynamics of vaccine-induced cellular immunity, particularly in individuals who fail to develop detectable IgG antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the development and timing of T-cell immunity following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in antibody-non-responders to COVID-19 vaccination.
METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on COVID-19-naive individuals who had received full SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, categorized by SARS-CoV-2 IgG serostatus. T-cell response was evaluated using the IGRA methodology T-SPOT®.COVID (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK). T-cell response rates and levels were compared between SARS-CoV-2 seropositive and seronegative groups, and a temporal cutoff analysis was applied to examine trends in T-cell response over time.
RESULTS: Within the seronegative group, IgG levels showed a strong negative correlation with time since vaccination (Spearman ρ = -0.65, p < 0.001), while T-cell response levels exhibited a weak positive time-dependent trend (ρ = 0.15, p = 0.019). Temporal cutoff analysis identified a critical time-point beginning at 80 days post-vaccination, after which both T-cell response rates and levels were significantly higher. Specifically, individuals tested after 80 days showed increased median T-cell response levels (U = 4205, p < 0.001) and higher positive T-cell response rate (67% vs. 38%, Χ2 = 17.06, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Cellular immunity response against SARS-CoV-2 may emerge later than expected in antibody-non-responders to COVID-19 vaccination, with the 80-day post-vaccination mark emerging as a critical time point. Our results support the inclusion of cellular assays in post-vaccination monitoring and emphasize the need to reconsider the timing and criteria for evaluating vaccine response.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the development and timing of T-cell immunity following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in antibody-non-responders to COVID-19 vaccination.
METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on COVID-19-naive individuals who had received full SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, categorized by SARS-CoV-2 IgG serostatus. T-cell response was evaluated using the IGRA methodology T-SPOT®.COVID (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK). T-cell response rates and levels were compared between SARS-CoV-2 seropositive and seronegative groups, and a temporal cutoff analysis was applied to examine trends in T-cell response over time.
RESULTS: Within the seronegative group, IgG levels showed a strong negative correlation with time since vaccination (Spearman ρ = -0.65, p < 0.001), while T-cell response levels exhibited a weak positive time-dependent trend (ρ = 0.15, p = 0.019). Temporal cutoff analysis identified a critical time-point beginning at 80 days post-vaccination, after which both T-cell response rates and levels were significantly higher. Specifically, individuals tested after 80 days showed increased median T-cell response levels (U = 4205, p < 0.001) and higher positive T-cell response rate (67% vs. 38%, Χ2 = 17.06, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Cellular immunity response against SARS-CoV-2 may emerge later than expected in antibody-non-responders to COVID-19 vaccination, with the 80-day post-vaccination mark emerging as a critical time point. Our results support the inclusion of cellular assays in post-vaccination monitoring and emphasize the need to reconsider the timing and criteria for evaluating vaccine response.