Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2012
Evaluation of the geometric accuracy of anatomic landmarks as surrogates for intrapulmonary tumors in image-guided radiotherapy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Hong-Sheng, Kong Ling-Ling, Zhang Jian, Li Bao-Sheng, Chen Jin-Hu, Zhu Jian, Liu Tong-Hai, Yin Yong
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the geometric accuracy of thoracic anatomic landmarks as target surrogates of intrapulmonary tumors for manual rigid registration during image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).
METHODS: Kilovolt cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images acquired during IGRT for 29 lung cancer patients with 33 tumors, including 16 central and 17 peripheral lesions, were analyzed. We selected the "vertebrae", "carina", and "large bronchi" as the candidate surrogates for central targets, and the "vertebrae", "carina", and "ribs" as the candidate surrogates for peripheral lesions. Three to six pairs of small identifiable markers were noted in the tumors for the planning CT and Day 1 CBCT. The accuracy of the candidate surrogates was evaluated by comparing the distances of the corresponding markers after manual rigid matching based on the "tumor" and a particular surrogate. Differences between the surrogates were assessed using 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc least-significant-difference tests.
RESULTS: For central targets, the residual errors increased in the following ascending order: "tumor", "bronchi", "carina", and "vertebrae"; there was a significant difference between "tumor" and "vertebrae" (p=0.010). For peripheral diseases, the residual errors increased in the following ascending order: "tumor", "ribs", "vertebrae", and "carina". There was a significant difference between "tumor" and "carina" (p=0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: The "bronchi" and "carina" are the optimal surrogates for central lung targets, while "ribs" and "vertebrae" are the optimal surrogates for peripheral lung targets for manual matching of online and planned tumors.
METHODS: Kilovolt cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images acquired during IGRT for 29 lung cancer patients with 33 tumors, including 16 central and 17 peripheral lesions, were analyzed. We selected the "vertebrae", "carina", and "large bronchi" as the candidate surrogates for central targets, and the "vertebrae", "carina", and "ribs" as the candidate surrogates for peripheral lesions. Three to six pairs of small identifiable markers were noted in the tumors for the planning CT and Day 1 CBCT. The accuracy of the candidate surrogates was evaluated by comparing the distances of the corresponding markers after manual rigid matching based on the "tumor" and a particular surrogate. Differences between the surrogates were assessed using 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc least-significant-difference tests.
RESULTS: For central targets, the residual errors increased in the following ascending order: "tumor", "bronchi", "carina", and "vertebrae"; there was a significant difference between "tumor" and "vertebrae" (p=0.010). For peripheral diseases, the residual errors increased in the following ascending order: "tumor", "ribs", "vertebrae", and "carina". There was a significant difference between "tumor" and "carina" (p=0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: The "bronchi" and "carina" are the optimal surrogates for central lung targets, while "ribs" and "vertebrae" are the optimal surrogates for peripheral lung targets for manual matching of online and planned tumors.