MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke · 2001

[Quality of rapid tests for determination of infectious mononucleosis].

Skurtveit K J, Bjelkarøy W I, Christensen N G, Thue G, Sandberg S, Hoddevik G

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The Norwegian centre for quality assurance in primary health care, NOKLUS, was established in 1992 to ensure the quality of laboratory analyses performed in primary health care. This article evaluates results from the surveys of infectious mononucleosis.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

From 1996 to 2000, five serum panels were sent to participating practices in order to control test-kits designed for serological rapid diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis. 648 practices participated in this external quality assessment in 2000. Target values were determined using the Paul Bunell Davidsohn test. The results obtained for each type of test and variables that might have affected the results were evaluated.

RESULTS

Outdated kits or kits close to the date of expiration showed poorer results than the other test-kits. The quality of the results depended mainly on the type of test-kit used and the training level of the persons performing the analyses.

INTERPRETATION: The best performing tests in these surveys were Clearview IM (Unipath Limited) and Contrast Mono (Genzyme diagnostics). These two tests are among the three most frequently used tests, out of a total of thirteen, in our surveys.

Для цитирования: Skurtveit K J, Bjelkarøy W I, Christensen N G, Thue G, Sandberg S, Hoddevik G. [Quality of rapid tests for determination of infectious mononucleosis].. Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke. 2001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.