MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1714/3487.34674

Медицинская библиотека · Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006) · 2020

[Coronary wire entrapment and unintended extraction of a just deployed stent].

Talanas Giuseppe, Siciliano Roberta, Canonico Mario Enrico, Parodi Guido

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A 53-year-old male was admitted to our department for unstable angina. Coronary angiography showed a subocclusive stenosis in the ostial-proximal tract of an intermediate branch in the context of a left dominance system. We proceeded with an ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention considering this intermediate branch lesion in the setting of a bifurcation (Medina 0,0,1), where the proximal and distal main branches were represented by the left main and left anterior descending (LAD) arteries, respectively. After pre-dilation of the intermediate branch lesion, we advanced a "safety balloon" in order to protect the LAD branch and, simultaneously, we deployed a 3.0/22 mm drug-eluting stent in the intermediate branch. After in-stent post-dilation, we felt a strong resistance during the guidewire removal from the LAD indicating a wire entrapment. After a vigorous traction of the jailed guidewire, we observed the accidental removal of the just deployed stent from the guiding catheter. We re-advanced a guidewire on the LAD and a 3.25/23 mm drug-eluting stent was successfully implanted on the intermediate branch. We briefly discuss the occurred complication and some technical aspects regarding this case.

Для цитирования: Talanas Giuseppe, Siciliano Roberta, Canonico Mario Enrico, Parodi Guido. [Coronary wire entrapment and unintended extraction of a just deployed stent].. Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006). 2020. DOI: 10.1714/3487.34674.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.