Academic pediatrics · 2026
Higher citation rates of network research publications in Pediatrics education.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schwartz Alan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Publications of medical education research networks have been associated with higher rigor and higher-level outcomes. We sought to determine whether they also receive more citations than comparable papers.
METHODS: We compared citation rates for pediatric education articles published from studies by the Association of Pediatric Program Directors Longitudinal Educational Assessment Research Network (APPD LEARN) with other pediatric education papers, non-pediatric education papers, non-education pediatric papers, and non-education non-pediatric papers, controlling for journal, issue, and numbers of co-authors using a Poisson model.
RESULTS: We matched 50 APPD LEARN papers with 79 other pediatric education articles, 472 non-pediatric non-education articles, and 200 non-pediatric education articles. APPD LEARN articles had a significantly higher citation rate than other pediatric education articles in the same issues (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.53, 95% CI 1.37-1.72, p<.001). Higher number of authors was also associated with higher citation rates (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.35-1.41, p<.001). Non-Pediatric education articles were more highly cited than Pediatric education articles (marginal mean difference 10.6, 95% CI 9.7 - 11.4, p<.001) and Pediatric non-education articles were more highly cited than non-Pediatric non-education articles (marginal mean difference 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 - 2.3, p<.001).
DISCUSSION: Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that network-based medical education papers receive more citations than comparable non-network-based papers.
METHODS: We compared citation rates for pediatric education articles published from studies by the Association of Pediatric Program Directors Longitudinal Educational Assessment Research Network (APPD LEARN) with other pediatric education papers, non-pediatric education papers, non-education pediatric papers, and non-education non-pediatric papers, controlling for journal, issue, and numbers of co-authors using a Poisson model.
RESULTS: We matched 50 APPD LEARN papers with 79 other pediatric education articles, 472 non-pediatric non-education articles, and 200 non-pediatric education articles. APPD LEARN articles had a significantly higher citation rate than other pediatric education articles in the same issues (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.53, 95% CI 1.37-1.72, p<.001). Higher number of authors was also associated with higher citation rates (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.35-1.41, p<.001). Non-Pediatric education articles were more highly cited than Pediatric education articles (marginal mean difference 10.6, 95% CI 9.7 - 11.4, p<.001) and Pediatric non-education articles were more highly cited than non-Pediatric non-education articles (marginal mean difference 1.7, 95% CI 1.1 - 2.3, p<.001).
DISCUSSION: Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that network-based medical education papers receive more citations than comparable non-network-based papers.