Academic radiology · 2026
Assessing Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Quadruple-Low Coronary CT Angiography with Deep Learning in High-BMI Patients.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Qi Ke, Li Shumeng, Wang Luotong, Zhao Jiangtao, Wang Xiaohui, Hou Ping, Yuan Dian, Zhang Yicun, Dun Aobo, Tang Qian, Zhang Mengyuan, Zhang Weiting, Gao Jianbo, Liu Jie
Аннотация
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To examine the feasibility of a quadruple-low protocol in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) assisted by the deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for participants with high body mass index (BMI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study involved 180 participants (BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m2). Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: the standard-dose (SD) group in 100 kVp with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V 50%) using contrast media (CM) administration at an iodine load of 245 mgI/kg (Iohexol, 350 mgI/mL) with a 10 s injection time; the experimental group underwent imaging with 80 kVp and DLIR-H, using an iodine load of 128 mgI/kg with a 7 s injection time, representing the triple-low (TL) with 350 mgI/mL Iohexol and quadruple-low (QL) groups with 320 mgI/mL Iodixanol. Quantitative image quality evaluations included vascular attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), while qualitative image quality and diagnostic performance were also assessed.
RESULTS: Compared to the SD group, the TL group achieved reductions of 29.4% in radiation dose, 47.5% in CM volume, and 23.5% in CM injection rate, while the QL group achieved reductions of 32.5% in radiation dose, 41.5% in CM volume, 14.5% in CM injection rate, and 9% in CM concentration. The image noise in the QL and TL groups were significantly lower than in the SD group (all p < 0.001). Overall, the SNR, CNR, and qualitative image quality of the TL and QL groups were superior to those of the SD group (p < 0.05). The QL group maintained the stenosis diagnostic performance (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: TL and QL CCTA protocols showed equivalent or superior image quality and diagnostic accuracy compared to the SD protocol and may serve as effective alternatives for reducing radiation dose and contrast media use in patients with high BMI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study involved 180 participants (BMI of ≥ 25 kg/m2). Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: the standard-dose (SD) group in 100 kVp with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V 50%) using contrast media (CM) administration at an iodine load of 245 mgI/kg (Iohexol, 350 mgI/mL) with a 10 s injection time; the experimental group underwent imaging with 80 kVp and DLIR-H, using an iodine load of 128 mgI/kg with a 7 s injection time, representing the triple-low (TL) with 350 mgI/mL Iohexol and quadruple-low (QL) groups with 320 mgI/mL Iodixanol. Quantitative image quality evaluations included vascular attenuation, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), while qualitative image quality and diagnostic performance were also assessed.
RESULTS: Compared to the SD group, the TL group achieved reductions of 29.4% in radiation dose, 47.5% in CM volume, and 23.5% in CM injection rate, while the QL group achieved reductions of 32.5% in radiation dose, 41.5% in CM volume, 14.5% in CM injection rate, and 9% in CM concentration. The image noise in the QL and TL groups were significantly lower than in the SD group (all p < 0.001). Overall, the SNR, CNR, and qualitative image quality of the TL and QL groups were superior to those of the SD group (p < 0.05). The QL group maintained the stenosis diagnostic performance (all p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: TL and QL CCTA protocols showed equivalent or superior image quality and diagnostic accuracy compared to the SD protocol and may serve as effective alternatives for reducing radiation dose and contrast media use in patients with high BMI.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyDeep LearningContrast MediaProspective StudiesFemaleRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleBody Mass IndexMiddle AgedCoronary Artery DiseaseRadiation DosageFeasibility StudiesIohexolAgedTriiodobenzoic AcidsSignal-To-Noise Ratio