Coronary artery disease · 2014
The relationship of plasma neuropeptide Y levels with coronary collateral development.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bas Hatice D, Baser Kazim, Yilmaz Samet, Tuncel Ayşe F, Yaman Belma, Abaci Adnan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Neuropeptide Y (NPY), a sympathetic cotransmitter, has been shown to promote angiogenesis in in-vitro models. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship of plasma NPY levels with coronary collateral vessel development in patients with coronary artery disease.
METHODS: The study included 81 patients with at least one coronary stenosis with at least 80% narrowing in coronary angiography. Collateral vessels were graded according to the Rentrop classification. The study patients were divided into two groups, namely patients with well-developed collaterals and patients with poorly developed collaterals. Well-developed collaterals were defined as Rentrop collateral score of at least 2. Plasma levels of NPY, vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and noradrenaline were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: Plasma NPY was significantly higher in patients with well-developed collaterals as compared with patients with poorly developed collaterals (P=0.026). In contrast, plasma noradrenaline was significantly lower in patients with well-developed collaterals (P=0.022). There was no statistically significant difference in vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor levels between groups. The NPY level was positively correlated with the presence of diabetes (r=0.528, P<0.001). The extent of coronary artery disease (Gensini score) was significantly higher in patients with well-developed collaterals (P<0.001). After confounding variables were controlled for, the NPY level in patients with well-developed collaterals was significantly higher than those patients with poorly developed collaterals.
CONCLUSION: In this study, NPY levels were found to be significantly higher in patients with well-developed coronary collaterals compared with patients with poorly developed collaterals. New studies are needed to show whether this relationship is causal.
METHODS: The study included 81 patients with at least one coronary stenosis with at least 80% narrowing in coronary angiography. Collateral vessels were graded according to the Rentrop classification. The study patients were divided into two groups, namely patients with well-developed collaterals and patients with poorly developed collaterals. Well-developed collaterals were defined as Rentrop collateral score of at least 2. Plasma levels of NPY, vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and noradrenaline were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: Plasma NPY was significantly higher in patients with well-developed collaterals as compared with patients with poorly developed collaterals (P=0.026). In contrast, plasma noradrenaline was significantly lower in patients with well-developed collaterals (P=0.022). There was no statistically significant difference in vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor levels between groups. The NPY level was positively correlated with the presence of diabetes (r=0.528, P<0.001). The extent of coronary artery disease (Gensini score) was significantly higher in patients with well-developed collaterals (P<0.001). After confounding variables were controlled for, the NPY level in patients with well-developed collaterals was significantly higher than those patients with poorly developed collaterals.
CONCLUSION: In this study, NPY levels were found to be significantly higher in patients with well-developed coronary collaterals compared with patients with poorly developed collaterals. New studies are needed to show whether this relationship is causal.