Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023
Comparison of the thickness of the erector spinae muscles between aspiration pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shimoda Masafumi, Tanaka Yoshiaki, Morimoto Kozo, Nomura Sakika, Yoshimori Kozo, Ohta Ken
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Aspiration pneumonia is generally associated with deterioration of skeletal muscle mass, which is usually evaluated by the erector spinae muscle cross-sectional area (ESMCSA); however, no report has assessed ESMCSA in patients with aspiration pneumonia. Furthermore, erector spinae muscle thickness (ESMT) was developed to be easier to measure than ESMCSA. Therefore, this study investigated the relationship between ESMT and ESMCSA in aspiration pneumonia patients compared to bacterial pneumonia patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected data for 164 patients with aspiration pneumonia and 480 patients with bacterial pneumonia who were hospitalized at Fukujuji Hospital between September 2018 and May 2022. We assessed the correlations between ESMCSA and ESMT and compared the data between the two groups.
RESULTS: ESMT had a strong, proportional relationship with ESMCSA in all patients (r = 0.908, p < 0.001) and those with aspiration pneumonia (r = 0.896, p < 0.001). ESMCSA (median 671.8 mm2 [range 164.0-1636.7] vs. median 1057.0 mm2 [range 161.3-2412.5], p < 0.001) and ESMT (median 17.1 mm [range 6.95-34.4] vs. median 23.8 mm [range 6.95-43.7], p < 0.001) were significantly lower in patients with aspiration pneumonia. A multivariate analysis of aspiration pneumonia diagnosis showed significant independent differences from bacterial pneumonia in ESMCSA (odds ratio 0.998 [95% CI: 0.996-0.999], p = 0.001) and ESMT (odds ratio 0.90 [95% CI: 0.84-0.96], p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a strong correlation between ESMCSA and ESMT. ESMT can be more easily used to evaluate skeletal muscle mass and can help in diagnosing aspiration pneumonia.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected data for 164 patients with aspiration pneumonia and 480 patients with bacterial pneumonia who were hospitalized at Fukujuji Hospital between September 2018 and May 2022. We assessed the correlations between ESMCSA and ESMT and compared the data between the two groups.
RESULTS: ESMT had a strong, proportional relationship with ESMCSA in all patients (r = 0.908, p < 0.001) and those with aspiration pneumonia (r = 0.896, p < 0.001). ESMCSA (median 671.8 mm2 [range 164.0-1636.7] vs. median 1057.0 mm2 [range 161.3-2412.5], p < 0.001) and ESMT (median 17.1 mm [range 6.95-34.4] vs. median 23.8 mm [range 6.95-43.7], p < 0.001) were significantly lower in patients with aspiration pneumonia. A multivariate analysis of aspiration pneumonia diagnosis showed significant independent differences from bacterial pneumonia in ESMCSA (odds ratio 0.998 [95% CI: 0.996-0.999], p = 0.001) and ESMT (odds ratio 0.90 [95% CI: 0.84-0.96], p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a strong correlation between ESMCSA and ESMT. ESMT can be more easily used to evaluate skeletal muscle mass and can help in diagnosing aspiration pneumonia.